I fully agree, but let’s wait and see what the full circumstances surrounding this case turn out to be before assuming that it is a murder. It’s looking like it may be a murder because that’s what the cop is charged with, but only the trial will determine if it is a murder.Murdering someone is excessive, no ifs, not buts
I think double standards and preconceptions are at play here, depending who one is.I've been to the US 8 times.
my impression of American cops is they are excessively polite.
But then they could see that I am a tourist...
Second time in as many months for the guarantor of our Coronavirus safety. He’s not exactly filling me with confidence.24-hour test turnaround. Getting close, I think. Should be embarrassing.:
No 10 does not rule out PM having to self-isolate if Alok Sharma tests positive for Covid-19
The Downing Street lobby briefing has finished. Here are the main points.
- Alok Sharma, the business secretary, has not yet received the results of his coronavirus test, the PM’s spokesman said. Sharma was tested after falling ill while delivering a speech to MPs from the dispatch box in the Commons yesterday. The spokesman said that, if Sharma did test positive, he would work with the government’s new test and trace system.
Typically predictable.So much for promises
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chlorinated-chicken-british-markets-us-trade-deal-trump-a9548431.html
The government is set to open British markets to food produced to lower US welfare standards as part of its planned trade deal with Donald Trump.
Downing Street on Thursday refused to stand by an earlier pledge to keep so-called "chlorinated chicken" off UK shelves, in the first sign of the government folding under pressure from American trade negotiators.
Ministers are reportedly considering letting in products like chlorinated chicken and hormone fed beef into British supermarkets, but applying tariffs to them to protect UK-based farmers from competition.
Have written to my MP about this.Typically predictable.
As well as a tariff we should expect health warnings similar to those on cigarettes.
We usually get the best explanations from those with a full and deep understanding both of the issues and the difficulties that some might have in following those issues, whatever they are.Where’s Boris Johnson, I need him to explain it to me, I don’t understand.
Scotland is, apparently, thinking of making them compulsory.Why are face coverings being made mandatory on public transport if they deliver no protection? In fact, they were said to be more hazardous than beneficial. Now, if we don’t wear these hazardous, non beneficial devices, we are going to be issued with a fine. Where’s Boris Johnson, I need him to explain it to me, I don’t understand.
Yes, I agree, we need the full story to come out in court with the full circumstances. Then and only then can it be decided if the cops actions were excessive and the appropriate sentence passed once that is known.
Why are face coverings being made mandatory on public transport if they deliver no protection? In fact, they were said to be more hazardous than beneficial. Now, if we don’t wear these hazardous, non beneficial devices, we are going to be issued with a fine. Where’s Boris Johnson, I need him to explain it to me, I don’t understand.
And who would this `we` be that you`re referring to?I know how I would treat an America who invaded my country, they have a tendency to loose their conflicts..we tend to win.
Yes Barry, I agree. A full and fair trial.I fully agree, but let’s wait and see what the full circumstances surrounding this case turn out to be before assuming that it is a murder. It’s looking like it may be a murder because that’s what the cop is charged with, but only the trial will determine if it is a murder.
..not the only thing you don't understand..however this time I suspect you are being coy.Why are face coverings being made mandatory on public transport if they deliver no protection? In fact, they were said to be more hazardous than beneficial. Now, if we don’t wear these hazardous, non beneficial devices, we are going to be issued with a fine. Where’s Boris Johnson, I need him to explain it to me, I don’t understand.
I bet soundwave looks like that
Me....I'm hardAnd who would this `we` be that you`re referring to?
This is my understanding of the policy:Why are face coverings being made mandatory on public transport if they deliver no protection? In fact, they were said to be more hazardous than beneficial. Now, if we don’t wear these hazardous, non beneficial devices, we are going to be issued with a fine. Where’s Boris Johnson, I need him to explain it to me, I don’t understand.