the decision to continue with the pregnancy rests with their mothers, not the state.That is why I mentioned the killing of 98% of Downs child conceptions.
the decision to continue with the pregnancy rests with their mothers, not the state.That is why I mentioned the killing of 98% of Downs child conceptions.
Theres a rather beautiful movie on 4 by tarkovskis (solaris), it came to mind in your description of waiting, being in a moment, it's worth watchingI’m just remembering a day whilst biding my time waiting for the weather to improve so I can go out on my bike.
But at 98% because of common practice. You only think the mothers are deciding, when in truth it's that common practice that has decided.the decision to continue with the pregnancy rests with their mothers, not the state.
Nearly all meanings have changed over time as I've shown, and that Wikipedia definition is far too narrow in consequence.ER, don't forget the Chinese are still using the same techniques and the definition of Eugenics is clear enough.
"Eugenics is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population by excluding certain genetic groups judged to be inferior, and promoting other genetic groups judged to be superior. The concept predates the term; Plato suggested applying the principles of selective breeding to humans around 400 BC.
Wikipedia "
And now you are trying to give it a new and sanitised description
The meaning has not changed when the original logic is still being applied en masse
That is an extraordinary figure, it's almost three times the UK rate, pro rata to our populations.From the Irish Times ...
"Irish exports exceeded €152.5 billion last year, the highest total on record.
I don't think so. The mothers' decision are usually based on individuals' circumstances, IVF, age, religious and political beliefs, family, their husbands' beliefs and wealth.But at 98% because of common practice. You only think the mothers are deciding, when in truth it's that common practice that has decided.
It was my way of illustrating that old style eugenics is still being practiced in the West, without even being mentioned by OG and JA.
.
Mother should never have carried me, she suffered from many health problems, the worst of which was pernicious anaemia, and the doctor was called as she struggled to give birth to me.I don't think so. The mothers' decision are usually based on individuals' circumstances, IVF, age, religious and political beliefs, family, their husbands' beliefs and wealth.
When you look at eugenics, it becomes political, some dictator (elected or not) decides instead.
My nephew was lucky to be born to a relatively wealthy family so his parents weren't forced into that decision by practical considerations.
it's easy to look only at the numbers and forget the individuals when it's not your family.So perhaps I can be forgiven for not being a big fan of Eugenics?
Quality of life is a very subjective, difficult thing to define. A few years ago I developed a rare form of dishidrotic eczema (pompholyx) that made it impossible to walk for a year. Fortunately I got better. But I enjoy and appreciate walking and many other simple activities by virtue of this in ways I never have. Often pleasure is with reference to pain.I don't think so. The mothers' decision are usually based on individuals' circumstances, IVF, age, religious and political beliefs, family, their husbands' beliefs and wealth.
When you look at eugenics, it becomes political, some dictator (elected or not) decides instead.
My nephew was lucky to be born to a relatively wealthy family so his parents weren't forced into that decision by practical considerations.
Sadly, despite the ready availability and cheapness of cobalamin injections, there are still many who suffer from pernicious anaemia. (And many doctors who tell people to consume more iron.)pernicious anaemia
I have to disagree. If it was very unusual to terminate a Downs pregancy, far fewer would do so. The fact that almost all are terminated and on the whole the medical profession and society consider that a benefit makes considering it not just an easy option but normal.I don't think so. The mothers' decision are usually based on individuals' circumstances, IVF, age, religious and political beliefs, family, their husbands' beliefs and wealth.
So perhaps I can be forgiven for not being a big fan of Eugenics?
it's easy to look only at the numbers and forget the individuals when it's not your family.
I don't know what you are all fretting about. If we and the rest of the world don't do something drastic PDQ about climate change, we are all going to drown or starve to death anyway.Quality of life is a very subjective, difficult thing to define.
most parents are forced to take the termination because they can't get the support they would need bringing up a child with Downs.I have to disagree. If it was very unusual to terminate a Downs pregancy, far fewer would do so. The fact that almost all are terminated and on the whole the medical profession and society consider that a benefit makes considering it not just an easy option but normal.
.
there is progress in medical science, whether muscular dystrophy or cancers, we don't have to opt for termination.It won't just be eugenics, it will be all-of-our-genics.
None of which alters what I've posted. It was the very early acceptance of the norm of termination that lead to the lack of support. If that acceptance had not been there, the social and financial support would have been there, as it is for so many other disabilities.most parents are forced to take the termination because they can't get the support they would need bringing up a child with Downs.
They need permanent care, you can't let them out of your sight, so one parent would carry on working while the other becomes 24x7 carer - or both will have to work from home and they need a higher level of income than the average to cope with the extra expenses. Then the child will need future funding when the parents are too old to look after them.
Well I shall buy some flippers, a face mask and a snorkelI don't know what you are all fretting about. If we and the rest of the world don't do something drastic PDQ about climate change, we are all going to drown or starve to death anyway.
It won't just be eugenics, it will be all-of-our-genics.
.
Lets hope that next generation evolved Humans v2.0 show some compassion to Humans v1.0...Yet we kill them before birth.
That apparently is the definition of eugenics you and OG are applying, a false one created from the misuses by the Germans and Americans in the past.
.