Well I look forward to the surfeit of British lamb and cheese we will be able to eat whilst we strike trade deals.
The world is a much smaller place logistically than 50 years ago.
I will be honest. I never thought the tail wagged the dog so hard, I mean I knew the EU was in principle the nominative head. And this is one of the reasons I voted out. But to discover it really is in charge.
Then I will be grateful to leave. I will appreciate the opportunity to build the UK from within and re nationalise our services.
You appear confused. What is the meaning of this paragraph?
"I will be honest. I never thought the tail wagged the dog so hard, I mean I knew the EU was in principle the nominative head. And this is one of the reasons I voted out. But to discover it really is in charge."
Care to explain, as it makes no sense at all. The EU is an association of member states, and is not actually in charge of any of them. it is a collaboration not a discrete state
The problem in the past is that Government policy has been to abuse the system rather than act as a responsible member state.
So your reason for leaving was on the basis of a lie.
And of course there remains the question of why you believe this "discover it really is in charge." when in fact the evidence is the exact opposite, it simply isn't in charge of what we choose to do.
Yet another lie
As to lamb The
UK currently imports around a third of the
sheep meat it
consumes, or around 100,000 tonnes annually. In 2015, over 95 per cent of
UK sheep meat exports went to other EU countries.
If you eat that lamb you simply pay twice for the privilege, once when you buy the lamb, and again when you pay more tax to make up for the Export income loss.
And while I rather like the optimism of your notion about rebuilding the nation and renationalising everything
Who on Earth are you expecting to do this when we have just thrown away all of our FTA's and biggest market?
This is simply fantasy
The leave campaign was never run for the benefit of you or I, simply to prevent application
Of the EU Tax avoidance laws
https://www.taxjustice.net/2019/01/23/brexit-and-the-future-of-tax-havens/
"Senior government ministers have been signalling the Singapore-on-Thames development strategy since January 2017, when Prime Minister May and her Chancellor Philip Hammond both flagged it up as a potential route. Since then other senior ministers, including Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt and Home Secretary Sajid Javid, have signalled that this is the model they would pursue post-Brexit.
Just to put this in context, Singapore has rapidly expanded its role as an offshore financial centre in the past decade, currently ranks number five on the Financial Secrecy Index, and has a secrecy score of 67. That secrecy score reflects general weaknesses in Singapore’s corporate transparency regime and low level of commitment to tackling corporate tax dodging.
So this raises questions about what senior politicians in London mean when they talk about Singapore-on-the-Thames. Mr Javid – a serious contender to replace Theresa May as leader of the Conservative Party, who has worked as a banker in Singapore – has spoken about using tax cuts and deregulation as part of a “shock and awe strategy” to transform the post-Brexit UK economy."
You've been had, lad.
