On what grounds?My point was the policy for the last 5 years not the next. Did he live here or not? or did he invest in a business then spend at least 2 years out of 5 out of the UK?
as I said, I was suspicious of how the letter ended.
On what grounds?My point was the policy for the last 5 years not the next. Did he live here or not? or did he invest in a business then spend at least 2 years out of 5 out of the UK?
as I said, I was suspicious of how the letter ended.
So now we are actively discouraging anyone from investing in a business because they live abroad?If you move to Australia, You can't even leave the country for the first 2 years. So yes if I wanted to live there I would be happy to be treated like that. Are all the people that have moved to Australia thick?
The last line of the letter says "If you are absent from the UK for a" then stops.On what grounds?
The last line of the letter says "If you are absent from the UK for" then stops
You missed my modification to the last postThe last line of the letter says "If you are absent from the UK for" then stops
My sister in law has just had a years sabbatical but she is still employed.So now we are actively discouraging anyone from investing in a business because they live abroad?
Now there is a clever idea.
Most of our investors do that.
And remember this bit?
"
Have lived in the UK for 15 years
Always employed, without gaps, now running own restaurant
Paid thousands of pounds in taxes
Employing several people in our restaurant, directly and indirectly
How was he always employed without gaps?
You're struggling here!My sister in law has just had a years sabbatical but she is still employed.
What's the Conservative lost hope doing today?
Honestly I don't know (and neither do you) are NI records checked? are Passport records checked?You're struggling here!
That letter won't be the only one, do you really think the person's situation was actually considered and not treated to a "knee jerk" auto reply when there are upwards of a million to process?
Oh sure!
Taken completely out of context.....He was saying this to "settle it once and for all"Never mind OJ here are some encouraging words from Nigel
Let's be logical about this.Honestly I don't know (and neither do you) are NI records checked? are Passport records checked?
around 2.3 millions have not bothered to apply.951,700 applied so far
35.9% got pre settled status
Around 2.3 million still need to apply
No figure for successful applicants
No figures for those rejected either
Get the picture?
And who can blame them?around 2.3 millions have not bothered to apply.
They'd vote with their feet after brexit.
The point is he said it! and on many occasions too. And "Once and For all!" could never be more pertinent than right now, what is your problem with that?Taken completely out of context.....He was saying this to "settle it once and for all"
Do you want me to put 108 video's on of Mrs May saying we are leaving on the 29th of March. (i'm not going to)
brexit is an obsession for the conservative party. It will run and run until the conservatives lose power then brexit would be abandoned.Taken completely out of context.....He was saying this to "settle it once and for all"
Do you want me to put 108 video's on of Mrs May saying we are leaving on the 29th of March. (i'm not going to)
"Potential problems" Perhaps aircraft will fall from the sky like they did in the year 2000 when all the computers failed because they couldn't update. LolOK folks, the Guardian/Observer are serving up more today:
No-deal Brexit will ‘instantly disrupt’ UK’s role as £174bn global data hub
University College London report warns of significant legal, economic and social disruption
A no-deal Brexit would seriously disrupt the free flow of commercially valuable data between Europe and the UK, leaving companies across the finance, hospitality, manufacturing and technology sectors facing “immense” extra costs, according to a new study by University College London.
The report, to be published this week, says potential problems post-Brexit with data transfers have received “minimal attention” in the debate over the UK’s exit from the EU, but could turn out to be as serious to the economy as more visible issues relating to cross-border trade.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/aug/25/no-deal-brexit-will-instantly-disrupt-uk-role-as-data-hub-digital-economy
Anyone in a position to declare the article wholly inaccurate, untrue (on evidenced grounds) and to guarantee limited or no disruption?
in the Brexit World there are no such things as problemsOK folks, the Guardian/Observer are serving up more today:
No-deal Brexit will ‘instantly disrupt’ UK’s role as £174bn global data hub
University College London report warns of significant legal, economic and social disruption
A no-deal Brexit would seriously disrupt the free flow of commercially valuable data between Europe and the UK, leaving companies across the finance, hospitality, manufacturing and technology sectors facing “immense” extra costs, according to a new study by University College London.
The report, to be published this week, says potential problems post-Brexit with data transfers have received “minimal attention” in the debate over the UK’s exit from the EU, but could turn out to be as serious to the economy as more visible issues relating to cross-border trade.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/aug/25/no-deal-brexit-will-instantly-disrupt-uk-role-as-data-hub-digital-economy
Anyone in a position to declare the article wholly inaccurate, untrue (on evidenced grounds) and to guarantee limited or no disruption?
It is amazing how leave voters trot out the same mistaken beliefs time after time."Potential problems" Perhaps aircraft will fall from the sky like they did in the year 2000 when all the computers failed because they couldn't update. Lol
How can the article be untrue when it uses the word potential.