who are you going to replace her withTM has an overdue meeting on Wednesday with 1922 Committee - time for her to get P45.
who are you going to replace her withTM has an overdue meeting on Wednesday with 1922 Committee - time for her to get P45.
yes I suppose in the same way that people who voted to leave have been categorized as racist/xenophobic/idiots etc. All by morally and intellectually superior remainersRubbish. This, like anti-semitic, is stupidly trotted out at any adverse comment against either party. No-one on this planet is immune from criticism when wrong.
And haven't you noticed the incredible level of misandry from women these days? What's ok for one is good for the other.
.
Garbage. Your post is epitome of misogony... Those football fans chanting monkey noises last night will claim not to be racist aswell.Rubbish. This, like anti-semitic, is stupidly trotted out at any adverse comment against either party. No-one on this planet is immune from criticism when wrong.
And haven't you noticed the incredible level of misandry from women these days? What's ok for one is good for the other.
.
her deal makes leaving the customs union difficult for the brexiteers.What is it about her deal that makes passing it such an all consuming khamikaze compulsion to her/her supporters? Are we missing something?
Michael Gove.who are you going to replace her with
If one wants to replace what she's been doing, an African grey that's learned a few phrases would suffice.who are you going to replace her with
From someone so often incapable of reading what's posted.Garbage. Your post is epitome of misogony... Those football fans chanting monkey noises last night will claim not to be racist aswell.
Had you said she was stubborn, or some other insult, fine, but once you generalise"she is a woman"you are catagorically being sexist. Fact. But you, ll degend it because you havent got a clue what either term actually mean.
Thank you your reverence, may I suggest sex and travel?
Really? and there was I, thinking he simply didn't bother as it would only get in the way of the sermon.From someone so often incapable of reading what's posted.
.
Well your women are stubborn post didnt take much understanding did it.From someone so often incapable of reading what's posted.
.
If it passeth, then it passeth all understanding.Guardian say may offered to resign in return for erg support for her deal last weekend at chequers. What is it about her deal that makes passing it such an all consuming khamikaze compulsion to her/her supporters? Are we missing something?
Or getting the spelling right in his responsesFrom someone so often incapable of reading what's posted.
.
No grasshopper, it proves that where Parliamentary decision becomes constipated,If it passeth, then it passeth all understanding.
It did for you.Well your women are stubborn post didnt take much understanding did it.
I, d agree with you had EU also removed no deal from table. One side removing it is meaningless, especially when you consider which side is calling shots, and one of the many reasons for that is our removing it, or thinking we have. The only thing we have done is tell EU we are frightened of no deal.. Not a clever move in negotiations, but thats to be expected with majority of MPs being remainers,ignoring their constitients and manifesto in most cases... Eg Nick Boles...Although that's still the legal default, I think no deal is now much less likely to happen than say a month or so ago.
Fair comment, perhaps flecc can give it a rest with his female stereotyping..? This is his third outburst against women. Its rather boring and irrelevant to thread. We all know May is female, we spotted it a while ago. Flecc attributing characteristics to her because of her gender is unacceptable. Ask your daughter.Zlatan - Give it a rest from the personal attacks
You'll have to use smaller words than that....It did for you.
Did you miss the exclamation mark after "She is a woman? That has a meaning, that it was known that it could be seen as provocative.
And in recognition it was followed by "Many women ---", not "All women ----", and what followed is true. Very many women do claim intuition, while men very rarely do, fact.
And did you also miss the obviously humorous reference to administrator HelenJ? That, and the aforementioned exclamation mark, and the Victorians reference surely made it abundantly clear to anyone that the whole post was tongue in cheek.
Except you it seems, which is why I posted that you don't read what is posted. The use of written English has many subtleties, many of which it seems you don't understand, so you misunderstand and then insult me in a disgraceful way with a comparison to racist football hooligans.
.
Quite incorrigible, you just did it again!Fair comment, perhaps flecc can give it a rest with his female stereotyping..? This is is third outburst against women.
I agree. Not all women are like this, but in any given group of people, you will find a higher proportion of women displaying this character trait.She's a woman!
Many women won't change their minds, they claim this imaginary quality they call intuition which makes them certain they cannot possibly be wrong.*
Margaret Thatcher was a prime example, and the EU had the same trouble with her. They made the mistake of giving in to her, but they won't make that mistake now.
Fortunately our administrator HelenJ isn't like that so she won't delete this post (hopefully! ).
* I blame the Victorians, they had a code of good manners which included the maxim that one must never tell a lady that she is wrong, only at most that she might have been misled. (by a man of course)
.