There was a Labour MP on the BBCs lunch time Politics Show today saying that this might not be the case. There may be a way to have a longer than 3 month extension and for our existing MEPs to stay in place for a bit longer than they should. This has never been done before but then again no country has ever left the EU before so its difficult to know.
That same idea was being flogged around HoC last week. However ,just think about it for a few minutes.
The supposition is that a EU parliament ,missing a number of MEPs because of a failure of one country to hold elections is or is not valid is untested. The logical consequence is that one country is disenfranchised. Now the ECJ has not been asked to rule on this.
So why would the EU put in jeopardy the parliamentary rights of 500 million for the sake of 60 million?...It would be insane.
If the EU were by any chance ,to grant the UK any extension beyond June, ..which I am not expecting, I would fully expect that a guarantee of holding EU parliamentary elections in the UK would be a condition. The idea of allowing sitting MEPs ,to hold onto their seats in a temporary capacity or as hereditary seats cuts across all concepts of equal treatment.
Moreover, because these seats could become vacant at any time,there would need to be auxiliary elections in the other member states,with a number of candidates elected on a provisional basis...