Well now when did that period take place?Aye. History is a great thing.
Especially one so glorious as ours.
I guess you failed at History then?
Well now when did that period take place?Aye. History is a great thing.
Especially one so glorious as ours.
Wrong again they had already been elected into a position before the Government selected them for that postWrong.
They are nominated by their government - or to be precise - they are proposed by the Council of the European Union, on the basis of suggestions made by the national governments.
Not elected.
But you and I are her Subjects we are not Citizens are we?Danny deciding attack is the best form of defence.
The Queen Danny - the monarchy - I mean - look it up - we live in a Parliamentary democracy. Sure she has the appearance of power and titles up the gazoo. But. She has no actual power. She is a figurehead.
She can hand out 'commissions' till OG thinks Boris Johnson is an astute political leader but here on planet earth it will still mean absolutely Jack Sihte.No. It was in amazement,,you really are ignorant of the structure of politics in your country. ..As flecc has found it necessary to advise you. Now I come from a republic and don't believe in the mystical properties of Royalty. But there is a reason that the officers in your army and navy hold their commissions from her.
Could we have a source for this. Quoting things without one is pointless.A Trade deal with America has just one or two little niggles attached
Why would anyone in their right mind want any of this?
The press will soon cover that up though!
1760 to 1840 was pretty good. This country almost single handedly dragged the world into a whole new economic paradigm.Well now when did that period take place?
I guess you failed at History then?
James O'Brian makes you sounds optimistic and reasonable OG.
We know all the so-called powers she has OG. Nobody is disputing that. But we all know that in reality she can do **** all of any significance without parliament's say-so.But you and I are her Subjects we are not Citizens are we?
The Queen has two individual powers that could cause a political crisis if they were ever exercised. She may refuse a government's request to dissolve parliament and call an election, if she believes a government can legitimately be formed. She also has the right to choose the prime minister: a formality in the case of a clear majority, but potentially controversial after an inconclusive general election. This almost happened in February 1974, when Labour failed to win an overall majority but the Conservatives considered power-sharing with the Liberals.
And of course she is unelected.
By the tone be probably did write it.Could we have a source for this. Quoting things without one is pointless.
You could have written it...
Yeah well I was elected head cub-scout so I guess I count too.Wrong again they had already been elected into a position before the Government selected them for that post
Commissioners have generally all held political positions in their own countries, and many have been government ministers, but as Members of the Commission they are committed to acting in the interests of the Union as a whole and not taking instructions from national governments.
Even you should be able to work that out, the system is no different that that used to select members of the Cabinet, why aren't you complaining they are unelected?
Well he hasnt supplied a source, reference so looks like he did. How low can you get. Its despicable.By the tone be probably did write it.
It was an amazing event,and it started in Scotland,where the Dissenting tradition and Scottish Enlightenment provided the scientific basis. Although it might be fair to include the huge effect of the skilled French Calvinists ,escaping persecution who brought practical skills.1760 to 1840 was pretty good. This country almost single handedly dragged the world into a whole new economic paradigm.
The industrial revolution. What an amazing event. And started right here.
Rule Britannia!
the source?Could we have a source for this. Quoting things without one is pointless.
You could have written it...
It was an amazing event,and it started in Scotland,where the Dissenting tradition and Scottish Enlightenment provided the scientific basis. Although it might be fair to include the huge effect of the skilled French Calvinists ,escaping persecution who brought practical skills.
Of course the trade which resulted in towns like Sheffield, etc ,was made global by the barrel of a gun.
Can you not see how convoluted your arguements are?. This sequence starts with your erroneous claim of an "unelected cabal" in Brussels, dictating to you. When called out on that, you then try an claim that they are still unelected,and undemocratic,because they were not directly elected by you. Then when shown that none of your leaders were in fact directly elected by you, you make again the spurious claim that at least they were elected. I show you that the person at the pinnacle of your political and social system , and how does have power,both political and moral, is not elected.We know all the so-called powers she has OG. Nobody is disputing that. But we all know that in reality she can do **** all of any significance without parliament's say-so.
Can you not see how convoluted your arguements are?. This sequence starts with your erroneous claim of an "unelected cabal" in Brussels, dictating to you. When called out on that, you then try an claim that they are still unelected,and undemocratic,because they were nit durectly elected by you. Then when shown that none of your leaders were in fact directly elected by you, you make again the spurious claim that at least they were elected. I show you that the person at the pinnacle of your political and social system , and how does have power,both political and moral, is not elected.
The fact that you claimed and indeed still claim she has no power ,despite clear evidence to the contrary,is pathetic. The powers may be limited and proscribed, but they are real.