Brexit, for once some facts.

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
Seaborne Freight also seem to have had the possibility of starting a service by brexit denied - by Ostend.

Apologies to Stevie smith: Not sailing but grayling.

'Impossible' for Seaborne's Brexit port to be ready for March
The mayor of Ostend has told the BBC the Belgian port will not be ready for a new ferry line in time for Brexit.

Bart Tommelein was asked about the UK government's award of a £13.8m contract to Seaborne Freight for a service between Ramsgate and Ostend.

He said it was "impossible" that Ostend would be ready and that he was going to Ramsgate next week to discuss the situation with "all the stakeholders".

His remarks came as Transport Secretary Chris Grayling again defended the deal.

Mr Grayling, appearing in the Commons to answer an urgent question tabled by Labour, said no money would be spent unless the service operated correctly.

Mr Grayling said there were "no reasons to believe any of those involved in this business are not fit to do business with government".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46799136
I wonder why Ostend would even begin to make changes for something that they have co concrete assurances will even happen?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: robdon and oyster

50Hertz

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 2, 2019
2,199
2,403
if there is another vote, brexit alone is not enough, it should be which brexit or remain.
As some brexiters do not want to pay any money to the EU and if they have their way, it will have much more serious consequences such as we cannot even negotiate a Canada type FTA until we agree to settle the divorce bill.
that's why for a second referendum, it's not easy to find a fair question or set of questions to brexiters.
True, wording the question would be very difficult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robdon

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,160
30,576
So remainers won a vote in Parliament this evening with less than 1 percent of the vote.

Should we re run it?
The vote was to place a restraint against abuse of parliament by the government. Merely an amendment to a bill, so hardly comparing with the import of Brexit.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,340
16,858
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
The vote was to place a restraint against abuse of parliament by the government. Merely an amendment to a bill, so hardly comparing with the import of Brexit.
.
and a proof that the majority of MPs are against a no deal brexit.
now is there a majority for some other form of brexit?
if one could eliminate one form of brexit at a time this way, then the only course of action left is to delay A50 for another year.
By then, voters will be sick of the B word.
 

boyabouttown

Pedelecer
Oct 3, 2016
132
92
58
sheffield
Brexit has degenerated into a "Damage limitation" excercise to placate a section of the public that voted in ignorance of the consequences.
What happened to the high hopes of change for the better the Brexit Voters were expecting?
Can anyone answer that?
I still have high hopes of a change for the better, you may call it ignorance, i don't.
 

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
I still have high hopes of a change for the better, you may call it ignorance, i don't.
Perhaps you can explain on what basis?
What improvements are you expecting, and who and what will cause them to happen?
That's the problem, we would all like to see "improvements" but there needs to be a lot more than merely hoping something good will come out of Brexit considering the high risks involved.
You haven't even said what these "improvements" are going to be.
Its not very convincing, is it?
When the referendum took place people voted in ignorance of the consequences.
Since then most promises made have proved false and incompetence revealed, so to still support Brexit, I don't call that ignorance either
I call it unjustifiable optimism, with no evidence to support it
 
Last edited:

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,340
16,858
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
Perhaps you can explain on what basis?
it's a bit like moving house.
you may enjoy a change of what you see through the windows when you get up in the morning.
The coffee may taste better.
 

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,340
16,858
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
Then you find the place needs rewiring and there's a damp patch when it rains. Probably in the one room that had recently been decorated.
ah,, the joy of brexit!
joking aside, many voters would like a general reset in our country. The EU favours the mobile workers, the sharky employers, the big companies, the big governments etc
Gosh, I begin thinking like JC!
 
  • Like
Reactions: robdon

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
ah,, the joy of brexit!
joking aside, many voters would like a general reset in our country. The EU favours the mobile workers, the sharky employers, the big companies, the big governments etc
Gosh, I begin thinking like JC!

There's a plan remember,but they can't reveal it without giving away our negotiating position.
(or something along those lines) :oops:
 

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,340
16,858
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
is that Chris Grayling on the poster?

he should be made Brexit Secretary! We could do with a laugh, Stephen Barclay is too sensible for this job.
 

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
it's a bit like moving house.
you may enjoy a change of what you see through the windows when you get up in the morning.
The coffee may taste better.
Assuming the availability of coffee of course, or milk, or whatever else you put in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robdon

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
Hey guys- You might get a laugh from this Yes Minister clip from a few decades ago........ Says all we need to know about the Civil Service attitude.
Cheers, Tony
Backs up many of the arguments we have made on here!
Particularly my post #43,728
"
And in the Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/21/tories-conservatives-eu-enlargement-bulgaria

In the early 1990s, when John Major was at war with his party over Europe, there was one issue on which, broadly speaking, he found common ground with the Eurosceptics. It was EU enlargement. Supporting expansion to incorporate the former communist nations of central and eastern Europe was the golden scenario.
"Wider, rather than deeper" was the catchphrase. By expanding eastwards – so the Tories believed – the European Union would become so big that political union would be impossible. A bigger EU would evolve into a looser union of free trading nation states, with weaker institutions at its centre. It was the way to put the brake on Franco-German and Benelux ambitions for ever closer union, while widening the internal market and promoting stability between east and west. The vision of Europe that Margaret Thatcher had outlined in her Bruges speech in 1988 would come into being.

In this as in everything else they have done, the Conservatives made a complete hash of it.

That Video is actually more of a Documentary than a comedy item!
 

boyabouttown

Pedelecer
Oct 3, 2016
132
92
58
sheffield
Perhaps you can explain on what basis?
What improvements are you expecting, and who and what will cause them to happen?
That's the problem, we would all like to see "improvements" but there needs to be a lot more than merely hoping something good will come out of Brexit considering the high risks involved.
You haven't even said what these "improvements" are going to be.
Its not very convincing, is it?
When the referendum took place people voted in ignorance of the consequences.
Since then most promises made have proved false and incompetence revealed, so to still support Brexit, I don't call that ignorance either
I call it unjustifiable optimism, with no evidence to support it
I can't offer any evidence of my optimism, i'm not even trying to convince any one of brexit being an improvement. You and many others on here are obviously a lot more intelligent than i am and can write pages about the pros and cons of brexit but still feel the need to insult people from behind a keyboard. Why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: OxygenJames

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
I can't offer any evidence of my optimism, i'm not even trying to convince any one of brexit being an improvement. You and many others on here are obviously a lot more intelligent than i am and can write pages about the pros and cons of brexit but still feel the need to insult people from behind a keyboard. Why?
Hang on there! who has insulted you?
 

vidtek

Esteemed Pedelecer
Mar 29, 2015
423
243
74
Bournemouth BH12
There is just far too much animosity regarding brexit, and it seems to have infected this thread too which is a pity; although we may disagree on brexit, we come here to help each other and receive advice.
I personally voted to leave, but I respect the other side's opinions and would not dream of deriding their beliefs.
Let's face it, nobody can see into the future, so whatever happens is unknowable to all of us, we are all just speculating as to what we think may happen. Why don't we all just wait and see.
 

Advertisers