Trolls know everything but I thought you knew that!zlatan, do you know toxic CO2 is?
Tom
Trolls know everything but I thought you knew that!zlatan, do you know toxic CO2 is?
that's not correct, zlatan. CO2 kills with just one part in a hundred and irritation in one part per thousand. Something that kills so easily can't be called mildly toxic. There are not many ways CO2 can be removed from the atmosphere, the trees are the only way we have in towns and cities. I have always believed that the long term solution is to install carbon capture facilities in cities.CO2 is mildly toxic
Not sure about your figures Woosh ee breathe out higher concentrations than you quote but any measures to reduce them should be used. We,d see CO2 reduction withh increased use of LPG.that's not correct, zlatan. CO2 kills with just one part in a hundred and irritation in one part per thousand. Something that kills so easily can't be called mildly toxic. There are not many ways CO2 can be removed from the atmosphere, the trees are the only way we have in towns and cities. I have always believed that the long term solution is to install carbon capture facilities in cities.
4% by volume is 4% concentration.I,d guess 4% by volume is well over 1 in 100.?
Ahem... Carbon monoxide kills - CO, CO2 feeds plants.that's not correct, zlatan. CO2 kills with just one part in a hundred and irritation in one part per thousand. Something that kills so easily can't be called mildly toxic. There are not many ways CO2 can be removed from the atmosphere, the trees are the only way we have in towns and cities. I have always believed that the long term solution is to install carbon capture facilities in cities.
So at what %age by volume does CO2 become life threatening ? I,d allways thought ( perhaps wrongly) you would die from oxygen starvation well before poisoning by CO2...4% by volume is 4% concentration.
A mole of gas at room temperature occupies about 24 litres, A mole of Oxygen, Nitrogen, CO2 have the same volume but of course not the same weight.
Ahem... Carbon monoxide kills - CO, CO2 feeds plants.So at what %age by volume does CO2 become life threatening ? I,d allways thought ( perhaps wrongly) you would die from oxygen starvation well before poisoning by CO2...
What is really happening above is you are consuming oxygen and when there isn't enough oxygen modules molecules left to stick to the carbon molecules to make CO2 you are left with CO and that is really nasty.The Answer
Ordinarily, carbon dioxide is not poisonous. It diffuses from your cells into your bloodstream and from there out via your lungs, yet it is always present throughout your body.
However, if you breathe high concentrations of carbon dioxide or re-breathe air (such as from a plastic bag or tent), you may be at risk for carbon dioxide intoxication or even carbon dioxide poisoning. Carbon dioxide intoxication and carbon dioxide.
Are you sure you listened.What is really happening above is you are consuming oxygen and when there isn't enough oxygen modules molecules left to stick to the carbon molecules to make CO2 you are left with CO and that is really nasty.
Despite what my chemistry teachers thought when I was in school I really was listening
about 2% by volume for causing certain death, although it can kill from as little as 1%. CO2 is a narcotic. You can easily die from narcotic poisoning. Of course, if you are suffocated, you are brain dead before the heart muscles and other muscles stop and die.So at what %age by volume does CO2 become life threatening ? I,d always thought ( perhaps wrongly) you would die from oxygen starvation well before poisoning by CO2...
You are a scuba diver IIRC? CO2 intoxication is a thing for scuba divers, we are cyclists and above the surface of the ocean you have very little chance of being intoxicated by CO2. One risk is dry ice, I haven't seen any of that since my disco days back in the '70s...Are you sure you listened.
The process you mention is linked with incomplete burning of fossil fuels. ( ie when insufficient oxygen is present only one molecule is available to attach to the carbon ...so as far extinguishes CO is produced..If plenty of O is around you,ll only get CO2..
I,m not aware of any time/ case where our bodies produce CO..You could breathe in and out of a paper bag all day long and I don't think you,d ever get CO...You,d be starved of O and apparently ( eventually) poisoned by CO2..( Its often a problem for diving rebreathers, not washing out the CO2 but to my limited knowledge CO will not appear, in a rebreather or paper bag)
But, we live and learn. I didn't know CO2 was in slightest toxic ?
Hang on a minute here...you are saying our breath ( at around 4.5% CO2) is poisonous ??about 2% by volume for causing certain death, although it can kill from as little as 1%. CO2 is a narcotic. You can easily die from narcotic poisoning. Of course, if you are suffocated, you are brain dead before the heart muscles and other muscles stop and die.
crossed with danidl's post
His post may be more accurate than my high school memory.
Who told you about milkman...Its supposed to be a secret ffs.You are a scuba diver IIRC? CO2 intoxication is a thing for scuba divers, we are cyclists and above the surface of the ocean you have very little chance of being intoxicated by CO2. One risk is dry ice, I haven't seen any of that since my disco days back in the '70s...
You breath in air which is composed of all kinds of stuff, your lungs grab a molecule or two of oxygen and exhale CO2 and H2O just like an IC engine. If you are in a closed environnement (paper bags are not my idea of closed but anyway...) you continue removing oxygen until there are not enough molecules of oxygen left to form molecules of CO2, your lungs have "burnt up" all the oxygen just like the car motor running in the closed garage after the love of your life left you for the milkman...
oh.. those were the days my friend, we thought they never end...Think we need a source here Woosh..I,m sure I,ve spent nights in night clubs with over 4%...
I haven't suggested it's simple and largely agree with much of what you've posted, but to infer that e-cars are a dead duck as you and some others seem to be doing is ridiculous. Yes of course there is no hope of them taking over the market, the infrastructure alone will prevent that, but they now have a very real presence which is going to increase much further. See the quotes below:And even if they do can our grid cope. Its as though all the required infrastructure is cost free in every sense.
Just stop and think of both the logistics of installing the required number of charging bays , the demand on using them ( both electric demand and usage) and the amount of time spent at them.
Not to mention the always forgotten fact that for every Ecar in London a dirty car moves out. Scrappage rates are pretty constant throughout country.( and way older than 2006, and rightly so. Remanufacture of cars accounts of massive pollution, if we all kept cars 40 years on a whole we,d be better off financially and environmentally, but govt and firms dont want that. They want Flecc and all of us to buy this years con..last time it was clean diesels)
On top of all this is the always forgotten environmental cost of Lithium batteries.
It simply is not as simple as Flecc suggests..not by a long way.
A friend of mine has a Tesla...he loves it. He,s just bought 3 series to sit along side it...to alleviate access to charging ..He argues the Tesla costs nothing to sit in garage, because the lower mileage it now does offsets the costs of his BMW !!!!( both tax free) He,s a garage owner so block motor trade insurance.
That's the real world..
And we will never see wholesale battery powered public transport. The bigger the vehicle the less sense batteries make. Perhaps hybrid..( running on powered cables tram/ trolley bus system with small range to negotiate difficult areas where power unavailable?)
What we should ( as a nation) be doing is getting as many as possible to clean up their old cars rather than scrapping them. Yes, its not a massive step but would make wway more sense than whats happening now..( Convert to LPG)
"Based on independent testing of nearly 9,000 cars from the EU that were manufactured recently and that have state-of-the-art pollution controls, those that run on LPG produce 11% less CO2 in operation and about 15% less from ‘well to wheel’, i.e. over the entire fuel supply chain than identical cars run on petrol.
The research also indicates that LPG cars produce less NOx than both petrol and diesel ones. In fact, when compared to diesel, five times less NOx is emitted. LPG vehicles are significantly lower on particle emissions as well.
Cleaner air quality, particular in urban areas, is a continuing issue for the nation's health.
In 2004 Department of Health statistics show that particulates are responsible for thousands of advanced deaths and thousands of instances of illness. NOx emissions are also a major element of low level ozone, which causes smog and can worsen existing asthma conditions.
Extensive independent tests showed that:
•One diesel vehicle emits 120 times the amount of fine particles as the equivalent LPG vehicle.
•It takes 20 LPG vehicles to emit the same amount of NOx as one diesel vehicle."
Source. Green Peace.( Circa 2008 !!!!)
Way cheaper than buying a leaf, could work for us all,no new cars needed and whole country would benefit. No Lithium required either..
Govt should be giving incentives for conversion and facility to change tax bands after. They would rather support big industry to sell you stuff that doesn't actually help. ( They knew all along about diesel con and know full well now battery powered cars are not way forward)