So where did I say anything about this in the linked post?I refer to the margin 48/52 as possibly indecisive. If parliament takes the view that the margin was indecisive, then the correct course of action is to vote again.
And nothing I proposed in the linked post would prevent them voting exactly the same way again if they showed a basic understanding of the issue. I made no mention in that post of idiocy or ignorance, and with such a voting method I wouldn't be able to. Surely that's an improvement?I am arguing against the idea of restricting the right to vote.
To me, that will put democracy at risk and embolden dictators
People voted for brexit for a number of reasons so why single out this or that particular reason and accuse them of being ignorant (because they did not comprehend enough on that subject) or idiot for being sold a pup. Those insults and similar do not help bridging the divide.
I think you are too obsessed with the notion of perfect democracy when what we have is so very far from it. And the reason it doesn't exist is precisely because the system puts all the power into the elites that result from our present system of elections and governance. My proposal takes the power of policy setting away from them, giving it back to the people but with the safeguard of ensuring the peoples' choices are based upon some knowledge.
.