Don't really follow your logic here OG. Appreciate that you can use any twist or turn to heap scorn on the man but, surely that is the art of negotiation? You cannot possibly adopt a rigid stance when you negotiate? Unless, of course, you hold all the cards and that clearly is not the case for either side with BREXIT.
I am merely focusing on the Duplicity being employed to kid the Public, where by now almost certainly all that is going on is already well on the way to agreement, and the rest is posturing and tailoring the story to be presented to the Public in a saleable fashion.
After all why Make out there was going to be the "Argument of the Century" when in fact you already agree in principle and only details remain to be thrashed out?
As a negotiator for the Company on Customer Complaints I have to say the approach being made here is counter productive and time consuming, and the reason for it?
Using the press to inflame the public and make them antagonistic the process, as if it is a War not a negotiation on a friendly basis.
Amateur, unproductive, inappropriate.
And I'm being kind there.
Way back in the Thread Zlatan and I had an exchange where he challenged me as to my negotiating skills.
I set down the approach I would use, and he agreed it was the correct one.
Here is the First Rule.
Do not poison the water by giving the appearance your opposition faces a completely antagonistic negotiator with no intention of meeting your requirements even part way.
Now look back at the Governments declarations, and worse the way the Press has played this for maximum public Anger against the EU.
We can start with using the term "Divorce" to load the baggage of that situation where the true Description "Secession" would be far less emotive.