Wonder what would it take to give the driver that 'Magic View' that helicopter pilots have. Being able to look 'through' the truck in every direction? I expect it's expensive!
Do you mean Flourescent dyed Chanel scent before the wet T-Shirt contest?How about windscreen type water jets down the side of the wagon that can be activated on entering towns and city's and works in conjunction with the indicators.
The water could also be given additives for smell or dyes
Drivers of HGVs need to be on the right side of the cab as do most if not all motorists. The safety reasons for this are huge in comparison, the biggest is that many drivers can struggle to position the car correctly with the line marking the center of the road if they are on the wrong side, that inturn can cause head on crashes with drivers on the other side of the road. With HGVs and knowing what you now know about blindspots would any motorway be safe if drivers of HGVs had impared vision when pulling out into the middle lane or merging with traffic? Please look up the dangers of "wrong hand drive" as I'm certain without a doubt it would endanger and harm far far more than it could save.The problem is with ALL trucks, coaches, etc not fitted with right mirrors.
If the blind spot wasn't covered, or if it blocked drivers view, then FWD mirror wouldn't have been officially approved.
Full height windscreens and fully glazed doors and cab sides have nothing to do with rigidity, that's the cab frame/roll cage's job. They would eliminate all blind spots forward of trailer.
Seating driver on Left Hand Side, again, for max left view is obvious.
Again, move railings 1m out, outside bike lane up to Toucan crossing, etc..
Btw, did anyone see truck thrown around like a toy when hit by Freight Train, that was apparently in the drivers blind spot! http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?p=PLo_duJ_Kt_Emw_yo986-iPjYfpPs9kR31&v=kbux-Auv91c&feature=plpp here it is.
Which cannot be used on the construction industry trucks that are so often involved Mike, for the same reason that they cannot have side fences to stop cyclist going underneath. They leave the road onto sites with very uneven rutted surfaces that demand high ground clearances. In addition that sort of cab on a truck considerably lengthens it, creating a new set of problems.And here's Volvo's low, glazed cab truck ...Low Entry Cab - Cab variants : Volvo Trucks - United Kingdom & Ireland
Well said. A little over a hundred cyclists are killed annually on UK roads, and only a small minority of the deaths involve left turning trucks. A number are hit from behind, especially after dark, some killed though a collision with groups of bikes on narrow road blind bends, plus an assortment of other reasons. This year I believe the left turn accident deaths in London total seven, about half the average total London annual cycling deaths in recent years. Many of those killed were wearing helmets which obviously didn't help, and that's certainly true of the left turn accidents where death is due to body crushing.This discussion is taking flights of fancy (including my own)
We need accurate figures for the number of injuries and fatalities from left turning vehicles in all major cities.
Also, exactly what are the fatal injuries sustained, the continual call for cycle helmets needs to be challenged because many unthinking people think that they would help, I suspect fatality from head injury to cyclists is not of a significant number.
The BBC is a publicly funded enterprise and I think that the government should just commandeer air time to advertise the danger of getting between a lorry and the railings.
At the moment, I think that many cyclists are lulled into a false sense of security that as long as they have a yellow jacket and helmet, they will be OK.
It's been rather common knowledge for years. A couple of pages that came up on the first page of searching google for information on lhd uk crashes."drivers must sit on right hand side for safety" , so ALL the Left Hand drive vehicles, inc hgv's, are operating UNsafely? Mmm, I think continental drivers might disagree!
What would a glazed cab look like? Wonder no more Why the London Cycling Campaign designed a bike-friendly lorry | Environment | theguardian.com. And there are examples on the road, guess which!
I'm sorry you feel nothing can be done for cyclists as such. Try to bear in mind that Pedestrians make up 51% of the Killed or Seriously Injured on road.
Perhaps we should have an Ad campaign. like the Train Level-Crossing one...children cycling home from school, along the road, then loud truck sound and screen goes black with message "Watch out for Trucks"...would that suit?
Try using Rubber Skirts and Height Adjustable Air Suspension, up on site, down on roadWhich cannot be used on the construction industry trucks that are so often involved Mike, for the same reason that they cannot have side fences to stop cyclist going underneath. They leave the road onto sites with very uneven rutted surfaces that demand high ground clearances. In addition that sort of cab on a truck considerably lengthens it, creating a new set of problems.
As Clockwise says, it's all a tricky balancing act to reach a suitable compromise. Reaching a compromise that mainly suited bikes, the least used of all vehicles in the UK, would be madness, we have to be realistic.
Try using Rubber Skirts and Height Adjustable Air Suspension, up on site, down on roadWhich cannot be used on the construction industry trucks that are so often involved Mike, for the same reason that they cannot have side fences to stop cyclist going underneath. They leave the road onto sites with very uneven rutted surfaces that demand high ground clearances. In addition that sort of cab on a truck considerably lengthens it, creating a new set of problems.
As Clockwise says, it's all a tricky balancing act to reach a suitable compromise. Reaching a compromise that mainly suited bikes, the least used of all vehicles in the UK, would be madness, we have to be realistic.
Indeed, and it's no coincidence that these are the two groups not trained, tested and licenced. Time to introduce cyclist and pedestrian training with proficiency tests and licencing perhaps?I'm sorry you feel nothing can be done for cyclists as such. Try to bear in mind that Pedestrians make up 51% of the Killed or Seriously Injured on road.
We've had very large scale TV and newspaper ad campaigns in London and cyclists have just ignored them. Presumably they all think as you seem to, that the accidents are everyone else's faultPerhaps we should have an Ad campaign. like the Train Level-Crossing one...children cycling home from school, along the road, then loud truck sound and screen goes black with message "Watch out for Trucks"...would that suit?
I wonder if any of them would have been crossing the road at places other than crossings? No, nobody would be dumb enough to step out into traffic so all the evil motorists must be zooming up on the pavement all the time, it's funny when you think just how rarely you see cars on the pavement and how often they must have attacked people like thatIndeed, and it's no coincidence that these are the two groups not trained, tested and licenced. Time to introduce cyclist and pedestrian training with proficiency tests and licencing perhaps?
Again all hopelessly impractical Mike. I won't waste any more time explaining, clearly your mind is closed and in any case none of these madcap ideas will ever be adopted.Try using Rubber Skirts and Height Adjustable Air Suspension, up on site, down on road
How would Fully Glazing a truck cab make it longer ? Oh, U mean Low Floor, well a Flat Engine is a start.
And "make anything forward of the Trailer or Bed/Box/Body of Rigid visible" if that helps!
Don't forget 51% of KSI's are Pedestrians, which we ALL are.
You are still ignoring the point that the cyclist staying back will save them. I just can't understand the idea other road users should be burdened by your safety as you might decide to place yourself in more danger than needed. Learn to share the road, 5% of traffic, 0% of cargo, 0 multi passenger trips, lucky to get a look in for funding/planning tbh.Maybe Blind Spots are not the problem, but spots before the eyes, eh? A TFL report from Transport Research Laboratory. Construction lorries 'disproportionately responsible for cyclist deaths' | Life and style | theguardian.com
"Peter Walker
Lorries carrying materials to and from building sites are disproportionately responsible for cyclist deaths, something the construction industry is failing to take sufficiently seriously, an expert report has suggested.
The study, commissioned by Transport for London (TfL), recommends contractors give drivers "realistic" delivery times to prevent them rushing, plan safe routes to and from sites and treat accidents involving construction trucks as seriously as they do deaths or injuries among building workers.
Overall in the construction industry, the study concludes, "road risk is viewed as less important than general health and safety risk".
The relatively high incidence of serious cycling incidents involving all heavy goods vehicles, particularly in London, has long been a worry for campaigners. In the capital around 50% of all cyclist deaths involve lorries, which comprise only about 5% of traffic, with a high proportion happening when left-turning trucks crush cyclists".