Its explained in the video that they damage the tracks more which requires more maintenance and upkeepEither they are exploiting ebikers because they think that they have more money, or they just don't like ebikes.
Have they got documented evidence of that ?Its explained in the video that they damage the tracks more which requires more maintenance and upkeep
Why does the evidence need to be documented? It was probably witnessed on the trails. Many threads about people complaining that the ebikes mess up the trails so its fair enough.Have they got documented evidence of that ?
I personally think it's not true, I think they are just exploiting E-Bike riders and the guy in the video does not like E-Bikes, there is prejudice out there with a number of bike riders against these bikes, they need educating.
I assuming you havn't ridden a legal eMTB. The wear a tear on track from climbing eMTB is nothing close to wear and tear from heavy braking of descending bikes.Why does the evidence need to be documented? It was probably witnessed on the trails. Many threads about people complaining that the ebikes mess up the trails so its fair enough.
Problem is a lot of eMTBs have a switch for 'offroad only' use, illegal on the streetsI assuming you havn't ridden a legal eMTB. The wear a tear on track from climbing eMTB is nothing close to wear and tear from heavy braking of descending bikes.
The more likely reason is eMTB don't pay extra for lift passes.
I read a few other forums with people saying this just isn't true, that they do less damage, this is why I question such blanket statements as seen in the video above as they usually come from the people who dislike E-Bikes.Why does the evidence need to be documented? It was probably witnessed on the trails. Many threads about people complaining that the ebikes mess up the trails so its fair enough.