First and foremost I must say I dont like trade bodies, which whilst at conception have clear aims to benefit the industry but always grow into self interest,within the motorsport industry the MIA(motorsport industries association) is a classic example.
Thanks for putting your cards on the table Dave, now I understand your position.
I am absolutely sure however that Government will listen to a trade body with more interest than they would an individual company. As the electric bike industry is still finding it's feet in the UK surely it is sensible to have a voice now and try and shape the rules to which we will all be required to work rather than moan about unfair laws and restrictions after they have come into force?
Although I see you agree with a good number of the clauses within the BEBA code of practice I understand that there are some points that you take exception too and as I have said repeatedly we would be delighted to discuss with anyone interested in becoming involved.
Although I don't believe it would be efficient to go through all the BEBA clauses here, I should correct you on one important point. To become a full member of BEBA, a business does not have to hold one of the BEBA Members' bikes, that would be totally restrictive. This particular clause only applies to retail members. The thinking behind it is that it supports the clause that members should agree that BEBA can work as a mediator between the end user and retailer if there was an insurmountable problem between them. If the manufacturer or distributor of the bike in question was not a full member it would be impossible to reach an agreement between the parties involved in any such dispute. Despite your reservations on the mediation service that BEBA provides, you would be surprised how effective it has been thus far with most issues that have been raised by the consumer. Having a non emotional third party involved in any dispute is always helpful and certainly gives confidence to the customer. BEBA's opinion in these cases is not binding the Association is simply there as a mediator.
There certainly may be clauses within the BEBA code of practice that need to be revisited, and that is precisely why we have invited distributors and manufactures to talk to us regarding any barriers to entry. Maybe the cloning clause is ill perceived, and if the majority of members want it deleted or changed then of-course it would be. I don't think it would be useful do discuss the cloning of the Wisper frame any further I believe everyones views are fully documented already. I should point out that Oxygen are full and highly valued BEBA member and there is no problem between Oxygen and Wisper whatsoever.
David, although you would be welcome to apply for BEBA membership, I understand your position regarding trade associations and would not try to change your mind further. We will carry on representing as effectively as we can, the views of those within BEBA others through surveys whenever possible, and would welcome all and any applications or suggestions from outside the association.
Best regards
David