Search results

Very similar to myself regarding motorbikes and I have to say black was the colour of choice then, However now with advancing years hi-viz is now the colour when cycling.

Some people need saving from themselves.

Apologies, but having seen the result of brain injury I would not wish it on anybody so for someone to say helmets cause more deaths and injuries to cyclists is something I find completely irresponsible. Once again apologies for using your thread on clothing.

Of which you have provided none. The UCI makes it compulsory to wear helmets and I can't see them doing that if as you say they cause more serious injuries and deaths, So please try and be more responsible before making false statements.

Absolute rubbish, I shall wait with bated breath to see the so called statistics that prove this.

As I said 60 years, but regardless of that it is foolish not too wear a cycle helmet.

Totally untrue there have been cycling and motorcycle helmets available for at least 60 years, however I suppose if you bury your head in the sand you are unlikely to hurt it.

Why, This is the most important piece of cycling equipment there is and having seen the devastation a brain injury can cause in my eyes should be compulsory.

Fashion over Function is the modern mantra.....

Mahle motor on my Specialized is crank and so much quieter than any hub or other crank I have ridden.

It still appears louder than my Specialized Creo with the Mahle motor.

Depends what you want it for and your budget, There are still bikes available out there .

My advice would be cancel and try and find someone with a bike in stock, My friend has a bike shop and they are only managing to get a fraction of what they ordered and it is not going to get any better for quite a while.

I can imagine , especially if you cant avoid a stationary signpost.

And I thought the footpath was for pedestrians, Cyclists complain when peds step out in front of them and then go and ride on pavements, you cant have it both ways.

I had one for 2 years and did 2500 miles on it around the Peak District and never had any problems at all and found it ultra reliable.

But the vast majority of Wikipedia is filled with valuable and accurate information." ... The paper found that Wikipedia's entries had an overall accuracy rate of 80 percent, whereas the other encyclopedias had an accuracy rate of 95 to 96 percent. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia...

And that justifies breaking the law does it?

This is one of the least factual sites.

Why make your bike illegal?