Search results

That's why police said they wouldn't be following it up. Yep, MPs are a privileged bunch. All of them. And, ofcourse he wants to be attacked on it. Its trivial. He knows it, as rest of sensible part of country do. There is absolutely no recourse... "sorry, we won't do it this year, oh but rules...

Utter rubbish. If you criticise anybody it must be worthy. If not it makes you look pretty stupid,especially so as I keep telling you, there are so many worthy criticisms. You are doing it now, having your petty personal continued attack on me, but completely missing the real issues. Real...

How on earth is criticising pointless attacks on him defending Boris. He wants to be accosted on points folk either think are pointless or with absolutely no negative outcomes. The date story broke (as I said previously) is irrelevant. Fact is Labour have expended energy and time to a dead end...

No, Starmer initiated it. Paper picked it from him. (Starmer made enquiry to police) This was reported last week, before DM article. After bringing it up in PM QT Starmer enquired to Police, who made a formal reply. Telling Starmer they do not prosecute historic Covid breaches. Wether DM ran...

That's exactly opposite of my opinion/view. It's playing straight into Boris' hands spending any time on something vast majority of us (including Police) see as a petty waste of time... Have you actually read my posts. I, d said there are a whole host of things much more worthy of Starmer’s...

Well that's exactly what Starmer should be saying. But he doesn't, he reports Boris to Police and moans about a year old covid rule breach... And its, Starmer /Labour not attacking Tories on important issues we were discussing. My point was, is, why on earth bring up stupid things like parties...

Touché... We aren't running country tho, I, ve got plenty of time to kill these days. I would have hoped far more than MPs, but it seems they have time to report silly incidents to police and spend valuable time arguing about mentioned incident.

Give up.. Starmer started it. Yes, we know full well they have terrible attitudes. But in scheme of things it's petty and time consuming for both sides. Time neither side has. They should all be working on tasks in hand. Vaccine roll out, sorting Social care out, sorting schemes out for...

I, m not condoning any rule breaking at all but for goodness sake. It's a year ago, we are getting upwards of 50,000 infections daily, Omicron is likely to rear its ugly side any time soon, Putin and Xi are flexing their muscles, some unfortunate folk are getting buried under volcanic Lava and...

Well you could try this. It was a chap called Onda Sonara. I wonder if he carried it in, here inject this.

Well honestly nobody in our extended family, varying from 22 to 67, (14 of us) had slightest reaction. And, at various times over past year we, ve all had covid.. almost symptom less in all but one of us.

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/omicron-variant-facts Great article. Conclusion. Get vaccinated. Have a booster. Wear a mask. Get on with life.

You were hesitant because you over researched and studied it. If a 100 people have jab the only one to comment on a forum, or anywhere else for that matter, will be the one snow flake who gets a sore arm. Rest will just get on with it.. But result when millions are having jab is damned Internet...

I don't need to know about everything just whether to have jab or not. So that's a yes. What are you deciding about? Yes, it requires a bit of thought but not this utter rubbish. You and I are not micro biologists. We aren't giving lectures, we aren't (or shouldn't) be even giving advice about...

Agreed, but it doesn't work.. Tried it myself with other posters. It's easier to just agree to disagree and move on.

Once heard story from a nurse working on A and E... Bloke came in with a vibrator lodged well inside... Went to surgery... Doctor removed item, looked at it still vibrating away.. "that's duracell for you!".

Nope... Google.

Stop shouting...but you raise a very good scientific philosophical question. Does a chair exist? Perhaps conscious thought is required to really exist, so perhaps a chair doesn't.. Then it raises the question do VIRUSES have conscious thought... Well no they don't.. So in this way of studying...

That's shown him..(irony alert for Agnew)

Sorry GI, I, ll stick to having faith in doctors, not some so called self professed expert on the Internet, because that's exactly what is now seen as research.. And all you are doing is buying somebody else's propoganda. Internet is awash with qualified experts advising one thing against...