I'm not asking a question here......just thinking out loud......and reading between the lines........how I see it from HelenJ's 'sticky' regarding whoare...... it seems to me more like it that this person could not prove that he WAS an ordinary innocent forum member and not connected to the company he was suspected of being connected to.
Otherwise why would his membership be rescinded and all of his posts removed.......if he was a 'normal' punter.....mind you, whats 'normal' lol
Probably the proof against him was not totally 100% conclusive as I would imagine it would be very difficult to prove which person was using say, for example, an office computer.......
The more pertinent in depth questions, about IP addresses etc I will make direct by PM...... if I need to.....
What do others think I wonder.......
Lynda
Otherwise why would his membership be rescinded and all of his posts removed.......if he was a 'normal' punter.....mind you, whats 'normal' lol
Probably the proof against him was not totally 100% conclusive as I would imagine it would be very difficult to prove which person was using say, for example, an office computer.......
The more pertinent in depth questions, about IP addresses etc I will make direct by PM...... if I need to.....
What do others think I wonder.......
Lynda