I used to have a clockwork mouse when I were a kid.Typical arrogant cyclists, no wonder motorists hate them!
You know, the wind up type! Never did like it.
I used to have a clockwork mouse when I were a kid.Typical arrogant cyclists, no wonder motorists hate them!
In fact there are now almost as many cyclists as car drivers commuting into Central London and the remaining small gap is continuing to close.they need to add cycling in the vetting procedure questions so its easier to get normal people that represent the MAJORITY of the public who use the roads,
I still have one, it's a lot of fun.I used to have a clockwork mouse when I were a kid.
You know, the wind up type! Never did like it.
The cyclist is there by right, the motorist only by licence. That can be taken away and by the sounds of it, the sooner the better in your case.So you are travelling at a maximum of 20mph on a 30 or 40mph road, what gives you the right to block the road and cause tail backs of cars who want to go at their permitted speed, get back on the track! Selfish Cyclists, give them a yard and they take a mile!!!! I'm not like that I use the tracks when they are there and I can do short burst up to 26mph dependent on conditions!
I personally think all cyclists should be licenced!The cyclist is there by right, the motorist only by licence. That can be taken away and by the sounds of it, the sooner the better in your case.
I did my cycling proficiency test.I personally think all cyclists should be licenced!
I think all cyclists should have a driving licence that way they can understand cars more! If not that at least some kind of test before they get on a road and mix with drivers, its common sense!I did my cycling proficiency test.
Taking your idea further I think all new drivers should be required to ride a bicycle for a minimum number of hours before they can get into a car. They can do the riding with a GPS camera on the bike pointing at the rider to check it is actually them doing the riding.
Most cyclists do have a driving license, but this is honestly one of the most stupidest things you have said on this forum to date. I know you're no fool, so this can only be described as just downright lazy, garden variety trolling.I think all cyclists should have a driving licence
My stupid reply was in reply to the stupid post I was responding to where it was suggested all drivers learn to ride a bike, maybe you should read that and comment!Most cyclists do have a driving license, but this is honestly one of the most stupidest things you have said on this forum to date. I know you're no fool, so this can only be described as just downright lazy, garden variety trolling.
I have always been a proponent of yours and have enjoyed your normally uniquely entertaining form of trolling, but this is just low-hanging fruit. Quite frankly I expect more from you!
We could replace the word 'cyclist' in there with 'motorists' or even 'road users' and it would be equally true....unfortunately a number of cyclists are arrogant, selfish, deluded, ignorant lunatics who should not be let near or allowed on a road...
Wrong! Roads are for the Roman army to march on.Roads are for cars
What happens to the bikes when the cycle path comes to an end?cycle paths are for bikes
I don't think the Roman army had windy country lanes and roads!Wrong! Roads are for the Roman army to march on.
What happens to the bikes when the cycle path comes to an end?
Don't give our lot any more daft ideas.I wonder where that idea came from
http://road.cc/content/news/205652-zimbabwe-introduces-bicycle-licensing-12-months-jail-those-who-dont-pay
Naively we believe we can educate him.The carriage way is for carriages, be theyhorse drawn, motor propelled or two wheeled.
The only motor way, is the motorways.
But why am I feeding the troll?