What better prize than an illegal machine from a defunct company?
I’m disputing what you say but the two centre paragraphs seem to be at odds.There are many riding S Class bikes illegally as pedelecs and the likelyhood of getting caught is very low at the moment.
If you were caught the penalty would most likely only be a fine, but bear in mind the magistrates can order that an illegal two wheeler used on the road can be confiscated and crushed, it's happened to many. That would make the cost to you immense.
And if you were ever in collision with a pedestrian and they were injured or worse, even if it was their fault you could be facing a battery of motor vehicle charges and spend up to two years in prison. That too has happened before.
So those are the risks you need to weigh up, extremely unlikely to ever happen but the costs potentially very high.
.
It doesn't work like that, like the guy that went to jail because he didn't have a front brake. He was completely innocent regarding the accident, which occurred when a woman stepped out on him while texting on her phone.I’m disputing what you say but the two centre paragraphs seem to be at odds.
If the cycle was illegal but was not being ridden recklessly or above the assisted speed limit and the pedestrian was totally at fault then wouldn’t the legality of the cycle become a separate issue to the accident because it had no bearing on the accident.
That being the case then the punishment metered out re the legality of the cycle would be the same and not weighted due to an accident being involved.
It's as VFR400 says, our law does not function in anything like the idealistic way it's often portrayed as doing. Very far from it indeed, as the example given of Charlie Alliston's jailing for eighteen months shows.I’m disputing what you say but the two centre paragraphs seem to be at odds.
If the cycle was illegal but was not being ridden recklessly or above the assisted speed limit and the pedestrian was totally at fault then wouldn’t the legality of the cycle become a separate issue to the accident because it had no bearing on the accident.
That being the case then the punishment metered out re the legality of the cycle would be the same and not weighted due to an accident being involved.
Perhaps then the punishment is inversely proportional to the barrister’s fee.It's as VFR400 says, our law does not function in anything like the idealistic way it's often portrayed as doing. Very far from it indeed, as the example given of Charlie Alliston's jailing for eighteen months shows.
His only offence deserved no more than a small fine.
.
There's a different kind of truth in what you say. Where the Crown Prosecution Service have authorised a case but later realise it's going to be very difficult to prove, they often put their top barrister on it. They will even switch to a top barrister at the last minute, after the defendant has chosen a lower level one.Perhaps then the punishment is inversely proportional to the barrister’s fee.
You have instilled me with confidence in our legal system.There's a different kind of truth in what you say. Where the Crown Prosecution Service have authorised a case but later realise it's going to be very difficult to prove, they often put their top barrister on it. They will even switch to a top barrister at the last minute, after the defendant has chosen a lower level one.
So the inverse there is that the less likely it is the defendant is guilty, the tougher the barrister they are up against, a fundamental unfairness. I've even known a judge to assist a top barrister in such a case by threatening the defendant with an extreme sentence if they don't change their plea to guilty.
Remember, judges are just top barristers one more step up the ladder, and they often know each other well.
It's a myth that our legal system is wonderful, it's anything but.
.
You can have the confidence that today is as good as you'll ever know it, since it continues the decline in quality since 1994.You have instilled me with confidence in our legal system.
Wow, I didn't know that but my mother in law just quit after 20 years having become increasingly frustrated at the system and they way it is goingEven the magistrates courts have been affected, many now sitting with only two magistrates instead of three, that being due to a shortage of them.
.
Yup, that's the Scott Snaith I know, and that's a new BH e-bike.As you can see "The Plant" appears to be genuine!!
Just popped round to say thanks!
Maybe the photo is a Photoshop job. Scott doesn't look a day older than when I first met him over thirteen years ago. Remarkable for some one who has battled against such severe trading problems, massive debts and insolvency.One thing I don't understand. If he delivered it to your house personally, what's it doing back at the shop? Has it broken down already?
Exactly, and I don't believe that this kind of debt could be run up just through the failure of some of the Impulse 2 motors ...I would take a long time to clock up nearly £2 Mil of deficit.