that test is not relevant. The shape of the bar under test is nothing like the reservoir and the lever housing. The test keeps within the elastic deformation of their plastic X bar. One important aspect, their bar cannot go into plastic deformation, so it will snap like the carbon bar. The Al bar did go into plastic deformation. That would have been better for the OP because it would still retain some functionality.
Their plastic is not an alloy. So the item is not as consistent and much more susceptible to cleavage than if made in alloy.
I think you need to go back to your engineering school, Trex. You're talking like a scientist, not like an engineer who would understand the real-world applications. Engineers can figure things for what they are. All the bars were subject to the same test. Material X didn't break and didn't bend. All the others did one or the other. Sure, any material will break or bend if you apply enough load. How much load do you think it took to snap OP's lever?
The only defence OP would have for his statement that the lever broke with only a small load applied to it would be if the material had a clear defect in it, like inclusions or voids. Looking at the extent of the break, I can't see how that could be possible.
Despite all the science and engineering, common sense has to prevail. If the material were too weak for its job so that it broke when you pulled the lever too hard, everybody with a Haibike, of which there are lots on this forum, would be complaining and joining in with OP. Haibike and Tektro would have to do a recall, so OP would get his bike sorted. Hello! Where is it all then?
Try banging the side of your head to see if you can get your thoughts back in order. I'm sure its all in there, but maybe just a bit mixed up. Too many late nights planning the next Woosh masterpiece?