No, any suggestions?Do you already have a motor in mind?
You know, if my spare battery was 36 volts, then I wouldn't be having this fiasco lol. The battery is still going strong with decent Samsung cells, so really want to utilise it.
No, any suggestions?Do you already have a motor in mind?
That is correct.Am I correct in thinking that a user adjustable cut-off speed, via a display, isn't allowed in the EAPC ruling?
Mmmmm, maybe for the forum techie gurus, but not my cup of tea I'm afraidI think you should take your 48 battery apart and reconfigure the cells to 36v using the Vruzend DIY 18650 battery kit.
Should be OK, especially as it's not too fast. It'll be running at a speed where the back emf limits the current rather than the controller most of the time, but will still give full power for climbing.I also am looking at the Q128C 36 V 201 rpm version which I would like to run at 44.4 V (12S) and 22-25 Amps in a 26" or 24" rim. That is 1245 W nominal with the battery hot off the charger, 1110 W at battery nominal voltage with a 25 Amp controller.
Will it handle that?
You have to be sensible. How would anyone know how to adjust the speed apart from you. Do you think that some policeman will come along and press secret codes, then try and nick you?Am I correct in thinking that a user adjustable cut-off speed, via a display, isn't allowed in the EAPC ruling?
As I want this bike to be entirely compliant with the EAPC rules, then you've got a good point there. So, as I won't be going any faster than 15.5mph uphill, then I should be pretty safe from scrutiny anyway.You have to be sensible. How would anyone know how to adjust the speed apart from you. Do you think that some policeman will come along and press secret codes, then try and nick you?
The only problem will be when he sees you going along at 30 mph uphill without pedalling. If you then showed him that your bike only does 15 mph with the motor, he's naturally going to be very suspicious.
That's a difficult one because it's a 1000w motor, which is illegal whatever you do with it. Also, it's a bit of a waste of time because it won't be very efficient when restricted. It'll actually give less power than a decent 250w geared hub-motor. It would be much better to get something like a Q128, which at least looks like a 250W motor, and give something like double the torque of that one, especially if you choose the 48v 201 rpm version, which maxes out at 19 mph without restriction.@d8veh
I still like the idea of converting a bike using the kit in post #19. Could I ask you Dave, would you be comfortable, from a law point of view, riding a bike fitted with that kit, if the legal mode wire was connected?
Totally agree with you there. The blurb is a bit misleading, as it makes it sound like it's totally legal once the special wire is connected. I wonder how many people have bought these, and innocently thought that it is EAPC compliantThat's a difficult one because it's a 1000w motor, which is illegal whatever you do with it. Also, it's a bit of a waste of time because it won't be very efficient when restricted. It'll actually give less power than a decent 250w geared hub-motor. It would be much better to get something like a Q128, which at least looks like a 250W motor, and give something like double the torque of that one, especially if you choose the 48v 201 rpm version, which maxes out at 19 mph without restriction.
Mine's the Q128H 48v version and matches that speed. Masses of torque though.Q128C 36V 201RPM maxs out at 19.8mph on my KT lcd2, bit is probably about 19 as these lcds have a speed over read of about 5%.
d8veh, but how would all that perform in a larger 700c rim??Mine's the Q128H 48v version and matches that speed. Masses of torque though.