D
Deleted member 4366
Guest
Did anybody watch it today? It was about the most exciting stage I've seen for a long while. Highlights on ITV4 at 19:00.
They already have that. It's called the isle of man Zero TT.Do you remember when there was some controversy about whether some riders were using hidden electric motors and batteries? Wouldn't it be interesting if there was an electric bike class with "anything goes"? We might find some innovative motors, batteries and regenerative braking systems being developed then.
I was thinking of UK legal assistance!They already have that. It's called the isle of man Zero TT.
That's just the point though, competition improves the performance. Look at Formula One where they have all sorts of interaction with the batteries which eventually finds itself onto road cars. If there was an E-Bike class then we'd see some rapid improvements in all kinds of things.they got motors and system out now its just the cost and then there is the waight of the batt for the amount of power you want as you add more of that and the batt gets more heavy.
you can get 200bhp motors to fit in a frame for 10k but its not viable due to the size and waight of the batt.
Sorry don't understand 'the respect for the yellow jersey'It was nice to see that there's still a bit of sportsmanship in some racing. Chris Froome lost his gears, so needed a bike change. There's a sort of unwritten rule that if the guy in the yellow jersey has a mechanical problem, they all let him catch up again afterwards, which is what they did, except one guy (Aru), but none of the others would help him form a break-away group, so he had to comply too.
Later, there were some ructions between Aru and Froome, but in the end, they had to cooperate as a team to catch up the guy in lead.
It always amazes me that after racing all day for nearly 200km up and down mountains, the winner is only 1cm ahead of the second guy. Yesterday, it was about 2mm.
Kudos,Sorry don't understand 'the respect for the yellow jersey'
Why should the guy with the yellow jersey be given a better chance to win than anyone else,aren't they racing each other ro win?
My sport was yacht racing,if a boat lost its mast or was in trouble you stopped to check everyone safe,you normally got a time allowance for the time lost. But if you saw a boat couldn't get a sail up or had a mechanical failure that was your opportunity to roll your competitor.
Are we saying that if say Aru had a mechanical failure but wasn't wearing the yellow jersey the others would ride away,but because Froome had the yellow jersey they should slow down and wait for him to catch up.
Ridiculous....Can you imagine if Vetell had a mechanical problem and had to go back to the pits for a spare car then Hamilton and the rest of the grid would slow down and wait for him to catch up,just because Vetell is currently the F1 current leader.
To my mind when Froome had his mechanical problem that was the moment the others should have attacked the yellow jersey,
In the end Froome extended his lead,he didn't stop when Porte had his nasty crash on the downhill?..
KudosDave
Basically the difference is that the Tour de France is about finding the best rider, and there's effort in both rules and rider conduct to ensure the machine doesn't get in the way. That's why they can have spare bikes on following cars and use as many as they need. There's a strict set of rules to ensure the bikes in use are very similar in any one stage, ensuring a bike design advantage doesn't affect the result. Hence no recumbents allowed for example, and no disc brakes as yet.Sorry don't understand 'the respect for the yellow jersey'
Yes, but in that case, the rider didn't stop to change his bike. Why would the others stop for him, only to see him disappear in the distance?I totally agree with the respect shown towards the yellow jersey, however it could be argued that the eventual stage winner had the same mechanical problem after Richie Portes bike clipped his rear mech and nobody thought of stopping.