Torq's harsh ride

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,311
30,676
If there was room for the 28" wheel, possibly without using a mudguard, and there probably is, I'd keep the larger wheel and use an adapted large diameter hydraulic disc brake. The mount ends of the disc centre would need to be cut off, the disc centred and new mount holes drilled, bolt threads tapped into the motor shell or end cap. I'd already investigated this way of mounting a disc and it's quite possible.

An easy alternative is fork end extensions, only an inch long and perfectly possible.
.
 
Last edited:

coops

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 18, 2007
1,225
1
Manchester U.K.
Cheers flecc :)

Just curious as to why you'd choose to keep the larger 28" wheel (not that you'd ever consider doing this!) rather than downsize to 26" - is that for geometry, aesthetics :)eek:), some other practicality, to preclude respoking or just for the larger wheel efficiency? i.e. Is there some good reason, that I'm unaware of, why one shouldn't just use a 26" wheel for slightly improved motorwheel gearing (if one wishes) & use the available V-brake fittings for that?

Thanks :)

Stuart.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,311
30,676
Just to retain the 20 to 22 mph potential Stuart, though the 18.5 to 20.3 mph or so with a 26" wheel instead would be acceptable and I'd be happy with that in a hilly area.

In a fairly flat area the 28" wheel would be best though.

As you know I wouldn't normally want a disc brake, but I was thinking in terms of someone who wanted suspension forks, and the two tastes often go together.
.
 
Last edited:

coops

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 18, 2007
1,225
1
Manchester U.K.
flecc said:
As you know I wouldn't normally want a disc brake, but I was thinking in terms of someone who wanted suspension forks, and the two tastes often go together.
:rolleyes: ok, thanks flecc... I think? ;) You can breath a sigh of relief & step back into your own shoes now :D.