The Best Mobile Telephone Ever Made for only £9.10

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,161
30,578
Browsing this forum on a PC is painful compared to Tapatalk on Android.
I can only say your PC and/or internet connection is too slow then, I have no trouble in high speed browsing. You've seen my PC and connection spec above, and please note my connection is hard wired. Most of those I come across these days are using a wireless router connection, much slower than hard wired.

I have tried a friend's smartphone and his new tablet, but my reaction is definitely no thanks. What I've got knocks spots off them both for speed and convenience.
.
 

soundwave

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 23, 2015
16,875
6,492
Last edited:

Alan Quay

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 4, 2012
2,351
1,076
Devon
I can only say your PC and/or internet connection is too slow then, I have no trouble in high speed browsing. You've seen my PC and connection spec above, and please note my connection is hard wired. Most of those I come across these days are using a wireless router connection, much slower than hard wired.

I have tried a friend's smartphone and his new tablet, but my reaction is definitely no thanks. What I've got knocks spots off them both for speed and convenience.
.
It's not a speed thing. It's a convenience thing.

Tapatalk, as many apps for smart phones, is dedicated to one task, and so much more streamlined.

My laptop is of a similar spec to your PC.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
 

anotherkiwi

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 26, 2015
7,845
5,786
The European Union
Installed Tapatalk, hated it, uninstalled...
 

Croxden

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 26, 2013
2,134
1,384
North Staffs
Browsing this forum on a PC is painful compared to Tapatalk on Android.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
But a PC doesn't keep reminding us that your message is
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdallan and flecc

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,161
30,578
It's not a speed thing. It's a convenience thing.

Tapatalk, as many apps for smart phones, is dedicated to one task, and so much more streamlined.

My laptop is of a similar spec to your PC.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
That's personal taste then, and I don't find using a smartphone or tablet either convenient or suitable for what I want.

For much of what I do while online a smartphone is not suitable, so I'd find one far too restrictive.

I'm also well aware of the mistakes Tapatalk users post and their frequent complaints about something not accessible or that cannot be done.
.
 

Alan Quay

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 4, 2012
2,351
1,076
Devon
That's personal taste then.
I didn't say it wasn't personal taste, but I wanted to address the general sentiment that to read text from a forum it's imperative to have an i7 processor, 16GB of RAM and a 100Mbps connection.

It's also important to understand that bandwidth and speed are different things.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
 

soundwave

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 23, 2015
16,875
6,492
I didn't say it wasn't personal taste, but I wanted to address the general sentiment that to read text from a forum it's imperative to have an i7 processor, 16GB of RAM and a 100Mbps connection.
what planet are you on :rolleyes:
 

soundwave

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 23, 2015
16,875
6,492

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,161
30,578
I didn't say it wasn't personal taste, but I wanted to address the general sentiment that to read text from a forum it's imperative to have an i7 processor, 16GB of RAM and a 100Mbps connection.

It's also important to understand that bandwidth and speed are different things.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Why would I think those? I use the resources for the parallel things I often do when online, and not just in this forum.
.
 

Yamdude

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 20, 2013
842
639
Somerset
I just have cheap bog standard broadband with 8mb download speed...... doesn't cause me any probs. I can read/post on all my forums and watch vids on my Windows laptop and Chromebook fine.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tillson and flecc

Geebee

Esteemed Pedelecer
Mar 26, 2010
1,256
227
Australia
I have a smart phone but only use it for the net if I am away from home, my tablet hasn't been used in months, both are such a poor experience compared to a PC.

My PC is in the lounge other wise the wife complains about not seeing me and we have a 100/40 connection hardwired :)

The most useful feature on a smart phone in my opinion is the camera, I never need to carry notes, remember prices or specs when shopping just take a photo, dismantling something for the first time take a photo of the steps if needed etc.
 

D8ve

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 30, 2013
2,142
1,294
Bristol
You guys at the cutting edge of cycle technology and yet you shun the smartphone! Just collected my Moto G4 from Tesco, cost me £50 after I boosted my Clubcard vouchers.

Can't wait to get home and set it up, but I am stuck in the pub on my Moto G3 with beer still to drink ;)
I most strongly disagree.
Cutting edge in cycling is recumbents. Comfortable and energy efficient. That's the cutting edge.
Electric motors are so old from around 1920's I think.

Humbug mutter mutter.
 

Geebee

Esteemed Pedelecer
Mar 26, 2010
1,256
227
Australia
Cutting edge in cycling is recumbents. Comfortable and energy efficient. That's the cutting edge.
Nope, about the same age as the electric bike:
"the first recorded illustration of a recumbent considered as a separate class of bicycle is considered to be in the magazine Fliegende Blätter of September 10, 1893. This year also saw what is considered the first genuine recumbent, the Fautenil Vélociped. "
 
  • Like
Reactions: flecc

D8ve

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 30, 2013
2,142
1,294
Bristol
I know that they are an old design but they are developing. The seventies began the Renaissance with human powered vehicles.
The are the future just ask Sir Clive Sinclare
 

mike killay

Esteemed Pedelecer
Feb 17, 2011
3,012
1,629
My geriatricphone is probably powered by steam.
Because I live in the country, my computer is probably slow.
But the pace of life here is slow also.
Why fret?
I have a smart phone that was second hand when my daughter got it.
The only use I have for it is the camera and sometimes the torch.
I prefer to sit at my computers (I have two) for browsing etc.
 

DAJ

Pedelecer
May 8, 2015
92
57
11
I well understand what a smartphone can do, but I don't need or even have a use for most of those things. I don't need a map/satnav since I have a much better one in my car and don't get lost when I'm walking. I've got far better torches for when I'm out on a wildlife pursuit at night and I really don't want portable TV! As for prices, I'm generally uninterested in discounts since I prefer to buy the best and are not obsessed with cost. All too often one man's discount is another's poor wage. In any case, shopping for something is far superior on a good size hi-res screen.

And my computer is far from slower than a smartphone. Intel 7 3.6 gb processor, tons of RAM, all solid state hard drives and top speed fibre optic connection sees to that. (see below)

If circumstances change and I find a use for a smartphone that's an advantage for me, I'll buy one immediately, but that isn't the case at present.

Internet speed just checked:

Download speed = 84.83 Mb/sec.

Upload speed = 18.2 Mb/sec.
.
Flecc you may be misunderstanding me, the speed of a smartphone is that it is always on, no boot up time - instant internet access, instant email wherever you may be.

I too have sat nav in my car, it does not have live traffic though, maps are out of date on release and cost more than a smartphone to update. No touch screen to scroll and zoom and doesn't even support full post code. Worse still out of my car it is useless.

The torch isn't for night forays into the woods, it is for reading the gas meter finding the outside loo, or just getting a bit more light on some very small print. Always in your pocket though.

Never caught out without a camera/ video camera as always with you.

With regard discounts, let me know what you want and how much you expect to pay and I will provide it and keep the difference, unless you object to me enhancing my poor wage ;).
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,161
30,578
Flecc you may be misunderstanding me, the speed of a smartphone is that it is always on, no boot up time - instant internet access, instant email wherever you may be.

I too have sat nav in my car, it does not have live traffic though, maps are out of date on release and cost more than a smartphone to update. No touch screen to scroll and zoom and doesn't even support full post code. Worse still out of my car it is useless.

The torch isn't for night forays into the woods, it is for reading the gas meter finding the outside loo, or just getting a bit more light on some very small print. Always in your pocket though.

Never caught out without a camera/ video camera as always with you.

With regard discounts, let me know what you want and how much you expect to pay and I will provide it and keep the difference, unless you object to me enhancing my poor wage ;).
I do understand as I have friends with them and have played with a couple of theirs. They are brilliant for those who want or need what they offer, but I simply don't want one for the reasons I've mentioned previously a few times, some examples below:

I have a mobile but never have it with me since the last thing I want when out is to receive a phone call. Nor do i want internet access when out, nor do I need Sat Nav when out walking. My mobile is permanently switched off and is only for emergencies when travelling afar.

I never want to peer at a sat-nav when driving for obvious reasons, so on the rare occasions when I use my Tom Tom it's well out of eyeline and on voice commands, far safer. I've got lifetime GB maps so no update costs there and aren't bother about having traffic warnings for my very few distant journeys.

I'm retired so my computer does everything I want. Boot up time doesn't figure, since not only does it's spec ensure that's in seconds, as it's all solid state it's always on from first thing in the morning so just as instantly ready all day long as any smartphone.

And the final killer, I don't even have half a G at home! Indeed I can only rarely get one signal strength bar up in my home, despite being in a London borough. Our homes are on the lee side of a valley and completely masked from the cellphone masts on the North Downs to our south. One company wanted to install a relay mast a few years ago to give our homes coverage, but one local nutter had a campaign against it on "radiation" grounds and the company backed off. Now no-one's interested since there are so few homes involved.

So to conclude as I've said before, if ever I do find something I really want one for, I'll immediately get one. I'm far from technology shy, quite the opposite in fact, as my remote controlled home shows. And yes, I know a smartphone can do that too, but not as well as what I've got now.
.
 

DAJ

Pedelecer
May 8, 2015
92
57
11
I do understand as I have friends with them and have played with a couple of theirs. They are brilliant for those who want or need what they offer, but I simply don't want one for the reasons I've mentioned previously a few times, some examples below:

I have a mobile but never have it with me since the last thing I want when out is to receive a phone call. Nor do i want internet access when out, nor do I need Sat Nav when out walking. My mobile is permanently switched off and is only for emergencies when travelling afar.

I never want to peer at a sat-nav when driving for obvious reasons, so on the rare occasions when I use my Tom Tom it's well out of eyeline and on voice commands, far safer. I've got lifetime GB maps so no update costs there and aren't bother about having traffic warnings for my very few distant journeys.

I'm retired so my computer does everything I want. Boot up time doesn't figure, since not only does it's spec ensure that's in seconds, as it's all solid state it's always on from first thing in the morning so just as instantly ready all day long as any smartphone.

And the final killer, I don't even have half a G at home! Indeed I can only rarely get one signal strength bar up in my home, despite being in a London borough. Our homes are on the lee side of a valley and completely masked from the cellphone masts on the North Downs to our south. One company wanted to install a relay mast a few years ago to give our homes coverage, but one local nutter had a campaign against it on "radiation" grounds and the company backed off. Now no-one's interested since there are so few homes involved.

So to conclude as I've said before, if ever I do find something I really want one for, I'll immediately get one. I'm far from technology shy, quite the opposite in fact, as my remote controlled home shows. And yes, I know a smartphone can do that too, but not as well as what I've got now.
.

I believe you are missing out Flecc, but I respect your choice even though it astounds me ,;)
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,161
30,578
I believe you are missing out Flecc, but I respect your choice even though it astounds me ,;)
And I'm just as surprised. It baffles me how anyone can prefer a circa 5" touch screen to a decent full size screen with proper keyboard and mouse.

If I had a need while out I'd have a smartphone, but I just don't have such a need. I see others peering at theirs or tapping while out and about, but that's the last thing on earth I want to do.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geebee

Advertisers