Good Evening all!
I'm in the middle of a debate with one of the cycling industry publishers and I think I'm right, but I'd quite like to be wrong (as there is good money to be made).
So here's my question, as I've spent 30 minutes searching on here and whilst I'm sure its been discussed I can't find it.
At some point in the past there has been a UK case where a UK eCyclist was going to be prosecuted, but the prosecution was dropped because it wasn't in the public interest.
Would this be recorded anywhere, does anyone know any details?
I have a sneaky feeling it might have been back when the UK law was 200w, but everyone was selling and riding 250w, and thats why it wasn't in the public interest to prosecute - because the law was always going to be changed.
The issue has come up because a certain distributor of eBikes has said:
"There has already been precedent set whereby a customers was hit by a public bus on a speed pedelec and the bus company tried to prosecute on grounds of no registration, tax or insurance, but the defendant was found not guilty because it was deemed not to be in the public interest to do so. I think in a legal context this could pave the way for anyone using a speed pedelec, so long as they do not cause public harm."
http://www.cyclingindustry.news/50cyclesinterviewelectricbikes/
Now in all my time selling and working with eBikes and the law I've not come across this case. But its being used as justification for the selling of sPedelecs in the UK.
So are we at KTM and our dealers missing a trick? Is there a case that has set a precedent for this? I really can't see it.
Does anyone have any details of any cases at all either way on anything eBike related?
I'm not trying to start a debate on legality or anything. I'm just looking to see if anyone knows anything I don't about UK cases.
Thoughts please
I'm in the middle of a debate with one of the cycling industry publishers and I think I'm right, but I'd quite like to be wrong (as there is good money to be made).
So here's my question, as I've spent 30 minutes searching on here and whilst I'm sure its been discussed I can't find it.
At some point in the past there has been a UK case where a UK eCyclist was going to be prosecuted, but the prosecution was dropped because it wasn't in the public interest.
Would this be recorded anywhere, does anyone know any details?
I have a sneaky feeling it might have been back when the UK law was 200w, but everyone was selling and riding 250w, and thats why it wasn't in the public interest to prosecute - because the law was always going to be changed.
The issue has come up because a certain distributor of eBikes has said:
"There has already been precedent set whereby a customers was hit by a public bus on a speed pedelec and the bus company tried to prosecute on grounds of no registration, tax or insurance, but the defendant was found not guilty because it was deemed not to be in the public interest to do so. I think in a legal context this could pave the way for anyone using a speed pedelec, so long as they do not cause public harm."
http://www.cyclingindustry.news/50cyclesinterviewelectricbikes/
Now in all my time selling and working with eBikes and the law I've not come across this case. But its being used as justification for the selling of sPedelecs in the UK.
So are we at KTM and our dealers missing a trick? Is there a case that has set a precedent for this? I really can't see it.
Does anyone have any details of any cases at all either way on anything eBike related?
I'm not trying to start a debate on legality or anything. I'm just looking to see if anyone knows anything I don't about UK cases.
Thoughts please