It seems that the powers that be only ban these things as they have no frame of reference to categorise them.
Switzerland and Germany have high speed e-bike classes and here in the UK we have our very liberal single vehicle type approval scheme, indicating that the authorities are not completely blinkered, so I think there is much more to it than this.
For example, pavement vehicles like mobility vehicles and pedestrian controlled vehicles are limited to 4 mph (UK) and 6 kph (EU) simply because that's the fastest normal walking speed, so ensuring safety for pedestrians. Anything like the Segway will obviously be unacceptable for pavement use from the very first thought of creating it.
In on-road use, such as the mobility vehicles are limited to 8 mph due to their limited controllability at speed, again breached by Segway like designs.
There's also a well founded mistrust of complex systems where safety is concerned. Two examples. Cars have to have mechanical handbrakes, rod or cable operated to give reserve braking, since these have an inherent reliability that other means like hydraulic can never have. The London Taxicab designs must use castellated nuts and splitpins on critical joints like steering ones, since plastic insert binding nuts wear and become unreliable with repeated uses.
In contrast, vehicles like the Segway are totally reliant on very complex gyroscopic systems and electronic controls to be able to stop quickly in emergencies, so clearly having more chances of technical failures. This new design has reserve tilt forward and backward wheels to cope with such events, but both are non-steering so remove the ability to swerve in emergencies, an obvious failing.
The message is clear. Designers of such projects must do their homework and be more tuned in to the realities from the drawing board onwards, ensuring they have a chance of meeting real world safety standards.
.