Nope! NOT an offence if it was a bicycle / legal EPAC.Either way it was a hit and run, which in itself is an offence.
Nope! NOT an offence if it was a bicycle / legal EPAC.Either way it was a hit and run, which in itself is an offence.
It wouldn't be called "hit and run" but there would still be a related offence. Maybe riding dangerously, recklessly, carelessly or inconsiderately:Nope! NOT an offence if it was a bicycle / legal EPAC.
Completely different offence and criteria to judge. The point being that 'Fail to Stop' isn't an offence for a bicycle / legal EPAC rider.It wouldn't be called "hit and run" but there would still be a related offence. Maybe riding dangerously, recklessly, carelessly or inconsiderately:
Exactly, that was the point I was making.Completely different offence and criteria to judge. The point being that 'Fail to Stop' isn't an offence for a bicycle / legal EPAC rider.
When there were road tax discs mopeds & motorcycles were oddly taxed under the 'bicycle' class (some historic relic like an appendix?!?!) IIRC it was also the same on the V5.If the 'ebike' is technically a moped, (or motor vehicle) then surely the rider should not be called a cyclist?
Under Road Tax up until 1935 and then that class transferred to VED discs, historic as you say.When there were road tax discs mopeds & motorcycles were oddly taxed under the 'bicycle' class (some historic relic like an appendix?!?!) IIRC it was also the same on the V5.
Offences may have been committed, but not one of failing to stop at the scene etc.So are you saying if you run someone over on a bike, injure them and ride off no offence is committed?
That's only in respect of the permission to be on the road which has to be specific for each class of any powered vehicles.Pretty sure that is not true, if you look at fleccs previous post an ebike is classed as a vehicle according to the 1835 highways act.
What a load of rubbish and an arrogant thing to say. Thousands of cyclists use a dongle and you don't have a clue as to their riding ability or style. Wow, what a mindset.And the sort of people who use dongles are also the sort of people who ignore red lights and drive at speed on pavements/on cycleways, so are most at risk of hitting pedestrians anyway. Of course they are likely to try to run off after hitting someone too, but that just makes it all the worse when they do get caught.
and not 1 person has been killed yetAgreed, however the majority of the ones seem to revel in the fact they can do 30 mph on a cycle path as demonstrated by certain people on this website.