It still is where I am but weak consumer protection laws here.It was like that in Germany a bit back.
It still is where I am but weak consumer protection laws here.It was like that in Germany a bit back.
Yep, you got it, a quick look can defy reality.
Out dated wheel size, no component spec or bike weight, set alarm bells ringing and automatically make the bike overpriced by £500.00
As for "hitting the trails hard" etc.
Send a bike down to me to review, and I'd happily take it over some of my regular proven and recorded riding routes for comparison purposes. It would then not only test the bikes claimed use, but also test the bikes claimed range. I tend to think that it would cope with neither terrain or range.
I couldn't agree more Steve, I'm a novice but quickly seeing where the value is.For that kind of money, you can build a top spec'd MTB with BBS01/2...none of ours come close to that pricepoint and they all run Hope brakes, top class wheels/tyres, XT or XTR drivechains, Fox suspension front & back...I guess if you're charging £50 an hour for build-labour you could justify the cost, but I just don't see it in the final product...IMHO of course
No Andy...I'm an ex-forces WO Aeronautical Engineer who went back to Uni in 1990 to get a Masters in Automotive Engineering. I've been building roundy-roundy and Land Speed Racing bikes for nearly 40 years and decided to turn my attention to ebikes after owning a Bosch motored Haibike and realising it was sadly lacking in a few departments, compared with the "normal" bikes we'd already built (I still compete with three Hayabusas: a turbo 250Bhp street-legal sleeper, a full-fat turbo 560Bhp carbon bodied streamliner and a normally aspirated street legal 1551cc big-bore...all home built)Are you a commercial bike converter?
60 less than Mr.311 (RIP Bill)560Bhp carbon bodied streamliner.
how fast does it go 60 more than bub
That's Pete Williams, one of our racing buddies...he hand beat all the aluminium panels for his two-faced Hayabusa and has been building the jet-bike in his shed for a few years now
Out dated wheel size, cable operated brakes, zero component spec or brand of components used, no bike weight, all of which set alarm bells ringing and automatically make the bike overpriced by £500.00 and that perhaps is being kind.
For just £50.00 more, you can a get a branded eMTB, with 5 year warranty on the frame, 2 year warranty on all other parts, branded components throughout including wheels and tyres, 27.5 wheel size, full factory support, and nationwide dealerships.
Send a bike down to me to review, and I'd happily take it over some of my regular proven and recorded riding routes for comparison purposes. It would then not only test the bikes claimed use of "hitting the trails hard" but would also test the bikes claimed range. I tend to think that it would cope with neither terrain or range.
The first route would be ideal for testing the bikes range. Ridden just last weekend, it is a non taxing 34.7 miles of undulating grass and woodland, with a mere 3,773ft of elevation gain. Ridden using a Bosch powered bike with one battery. It would prove an ideal comparison as the Ibex should take the ride in it's stride with it's claimed 35-50 mile range capability, and it's ability to "iron out the hills, and fly down the hills".
My goodness, Bosch must have come a long way since they were humiliated by the Bafang MaxDrive at Nuremberg??
Out dated wheel size, cable operated brakes, zero component spec or brand of components used, no bike weight, all of which set alarm bells ringing and automatically make the bike overpriced by £500.00 and that perhaps is being kind.
For just £50.00 more, you can a get a branded eMTB, with 5 year warranty on the frame, 2 year warranty on all other parts, branded components throughout including wheels and tyres, 27.5 wheel size, full factory support, and nationwide dealerships.
Send a bike down to me to review, and I'd happily take it over some of my regular proven and recorded riding routes for comparison purposes. It would then not only test the bikes claimed use of "hitting the trails hard" but would also test the bikes claimed range. I tend to think that it would cope with neither terrain or range.
The first route would be ideal for testing the bikes range. Ridden just last weekend, it is a non taxing 34.7 miles of undulating grass and woodland, with a mere 3,773ft of elevation gain. Ridden using a Bosch powered bike with one battery. It would prove an ideal comparison as the Ibex should take the ride in it's stride with it's claimed 35-50 mile range capability, and it's ability to "iron out the hills, and fly down the hills".
26" is one of the most common wheel sizes across the planet. It's been around the longest and provides a stronger wheel, than 27.5", 29". Perfect for an ebike application, where the added weight of the motor, battery, and normally less skilled riders demands a stronger wheel.Out dated wheel size, cable operated brakes, zero component spec or brand of components used, no bike weight, all of which set alarm bells ringing and automatically make the bike overpriced by £500.00 and that perhaps is being kind.
For £50 more you can get a bike with a Bosch motor, however, you also buy a motor that has substantial flaws, constant reported issues on this forum and others. A motor which more often than not has to be sent to Germany by the end user to be repaired.For just £50.00 more, you can a get a branded eMTB, with 5 year warranty on the frame, 2 year warranty on all other parts, branded components throughout including wheels and tyres, 27.5 wheel size, full factory support, and nationwide dealerships.
No. Why? Because our bike has been tested. Thoroughly. I'm an ex bmx/4x racer (we're talking a good 10 years ago however!) I've broken all manner of frames and components. Snapped forks at the crown, literally rode bikes to death. I've hammered the Ibex off road at Queen Elizabeth, Stoughton DH, and also Peaslake. Crashed it, jumped it, wheelied it. It hasn't needed anything other than a chain, brake pads and a wheel true in over 1000 miles. The mileage is the maximum attainable mileage. I've achieved 36 miles on the lowest level of assistance, however at 17st, I am not the lightest! One of my colleagues achieved 50 miles, on road in and around Portsmouth, Havant...it's pretty flat, he weighs 9 stones. The other reason, is because you've taken an instant dislike to the bike. You don't like it because it's not Bosch driven, so it wouldn't be a fair test!Send a bike down to me to review, and I'd happily take it over some of my regular proven and recorded riding routes for comparison purposes. It would then not only test the bikes claimed use of "hitting the trails hard" but would also test the bikes claimed range. I tend to think that it would cope with neither terrain or range.
The other reason, is because you've taken an instant dislike to the bike. You don't like it because it's not Bosch driven, so it wouldn't be a fair test!
The bikes intended purpose is XC. For which it is more than capable. Byocycles don't sell new bikes direct, and probably never will.You are right in that I don't like the bike, I see it as being the best part of £700.00 over priced.
It was £500 overpriced earlier?
As for not liking it because it isn't using a Bosch motor unit and that it wouldn't be a fair test, is utter rubbish and you know it. You even make comparison to the Bosch motor unit within your marketing statement.
Yes, a factual comparison. 5Nm More torque.
Woosh don't use the Bosch motor unit, yet they had no issue sending out a bike to review, the BH didn't have a Bosch motor unit, and neither did the Panasonic hub driven eRace P or eStreetP. I didn't even own a KTM at that stage, yet KTM were willing to forward a bike to review
Why are all these companies willing to send you bikes to review?
You make comparisons, yet are not willing to allow your marketing statements to be questioned. That tells me more than I need to know about the product.
More than willing, and have answered every question you've asked as far as I can see.
Out of interest, what are your product return policies when it comes down to the Ibex being unsuitable for it's intended use or fit for purpose?