You seem to have forgotten or never knew that it is not up to her to prove her innocence, but for the prosecution to prove her guilt.here is no evidence trail that this woman was merely passing on false information that she thought could be true. The buck stops with her. The tweet & disinformation originated with her. She is the source of this disinformation.
She is claiming that she saw it somewhere else & merely copied and pasted. She claimed she saw another individual share the name Ali Al-Shakti on Twitter but could not offer any proof. Nobody can find an earlier tweet. The evidence is that this malicious falsehood originated with her. She made it up & tweeted it without any thought for the consequences.You seem to have forgotten or never knew that it is not up to her to prove her innocence, but for the prosecution to prove her guilt.
Unless, unknown to me she is some sort of Tommy Robinson activist, she will not be charged, and if she was, charged and prosecuted she would be found not guilty. Not knowing it was false is an absolute defence, as is not intending to cause harm when sending it.
The law - read it:
Online Safety Act 2023
www.legislation.gov.uk
Woman alleged to have shared false Southport suspect rumour speaks out
‘It was a spur-of-the-moment ridiculous thing to do, which has literally destroyed me,’ Bernadette Spofforth sayswww.independent.co.uk
So what?She is claiming that she saw it somewhere else & merely copied and pasted. She claimed she saw another individual share the name Ali Al-Shakti on Twitter but could not offer any proof. Nobody can find an earlier tweet. The evidence is that this malicious falsehood originated with her. She made it up & tweeted it without any thought for the consequences.
Her tweet was deleted an hour after it was posted but by that time disinformation had already been widely repeated by such malign social media "personalities" as 'Tommy Robinson' & Andrew Tate.
There are only two ways to make the prices of houses go down. The first is to build so many more that there is no demand for them, which would take many years. The second is to make it a pain to own one, like wealth tax, house tax, etc., which would push up rents, in which case they'd have to fix rents first, like they did in the 70s. The result was disastrous. It probably reduced house prices a bit, but there was no rental property on the market.On contrary. It would be very selfish of me, but price drop would also benefit society as a whole. I want house prices to go down. In my opinion it is criminal to keep them on so high level.
High house prices benefit only a very small percentage of house owners. I don't understand how people can't see that.
Answer is money.I agree with you. Earlier I was speculating on the thinking which has prevented a serious house building programme.
You can make illegal to own more than one or two houses. You can stop giving away council houses etc.There are only two ways to make the prices of houses go down.
Think about what you're writing and try a bit of logic. If what you say is true, wouldn't those guys have been arrested for it too. Maybe the offence of reposting a made up name isn't an offence after all.Her tweet was deleted an hour after it was posted but by that time disinformation had already been widely repeated by such malign social media "personalities" as 'Tommy Robinson' & Andrew Tate.
In that case there would be no houses to rent. Everybody would have to buy a house including disabled people and drug addicts and anybody else with no income.You can make illegal to own more than one or two houses. You can stop giving away council houses etc.
Think about what you're writing and try a bit of logic. What I say is true so those guys would have been arrested for it too but they are not currently in the UK.Think about what you're writing and try a bit of logic. If what you say is true, wouldn't those guys have been arrested for it too.
I meant stop selling council houses for stupid money which is pretty much giving them away.In that case there would be no houses to rent. Everybody would have to buy a house including disabled people and drug addicts and anybody else with no income.
There are obvious racist/Islamophobic dog whistles in her tweet. Firstly the name 'Ali', secondly that he was an asylum seeker, thirdly that he arrived by boat & finally that he was on an MI6 watch listSo what?
The questions are; will she be charged; and was her arrest excessive?
See linked article: https://www.turbulenttimes.co.uk/news/front-page/law-and-order-state-harassment/
I can understand the resentment that I think I detect in that post by Az. Younger people have a very tough time in paying the costs of putting a roof over their heads, but his prescription would not solve the problem and never could have. The numbers of people with multiple houses are small, but the shortage created by thirty years of mass migration and low levels of building, has created a massive shortage of homes. Getting a few people to sell off their second home would do nothing to reduce prices, and as you say would ensure there was no possibility of renting either.In that case there would be no houses to rent. Everybody would have to buy a house including disabled people and drug addicts and anybody else with no income.
So say you. I say nonsense (like most of what you have said here over the last fortnight).There are obvious racist/Islamophobic dog whistles in her tweet. Firstly the name 'Ali', secondly that he was an asylum seeker, thirdly that he arrived by boat & finally that he was on an MI6 watch list
She published the tweet. There is no earlier tweet mentioning any of the above. She cannot say where she copied & pasted this from. She has to take responsibility for the tweet & forr the events that flowed from that tweet.
What about David Atherton, who is also reported as having retweeted it. He's still in the country and not arrested. Incidentally, I had edited that post to make it clearer what I meant.Think about what you're writing and try a bit of logic. What I say is true so those guys would have been arrested for it too but they are not currently in the UK.
Tate is in Romania while Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is in Cyprus. I expect they will be arrested as soon as they set foot on British soil.
Try to tell that to people here in Devon and Cornwall where locals are pushed out of the market by buyers from London who buy houses even without seeing them.I can understand the resentment that I think I detect in that post by Az. Younger people have a very tough time in paying the costs of putting a roof over their heads, but his prescription would not solve the problem and never could have. The numbers of people with multiple houses are small
Last week, I spent a few days near Keswick where similar holiday let pressures exist. I will be going there again next week. I was discussing with some friends the question of why in places like that it is absolutely impossible to get permission to build anything new. At the time we were walking from Portinscale where we were staying to Keswick - a walk of about a mile on a path with flat open fields either side. The scenery of the mountains was pretty good, but the land we walked through was just flat fields with a few sheep and some geese occupying it. The area is a massive and valuable environmental wilderness, but these fields were just wasted. I would force the planning department to develop suitable spaces like that for low cost housing. I would make most of it for rental and I would make the government pay for it and rent it to locals.Try to tell that to people here in Devon and Cornwall where locals are pushed out of the market by buyers from London who buy houses even without seeing them.
Why don't you think she should take responsibility for posting known racist/Islamophobic falsehoods that she would know could have the effect of inflaming racial hatred?So say you. I say nonsense (like most of what you have said here over the last fortnight).