D
Deleted member 16246
Guest
There is no evidence that ANY animal population has a virus anywhere near the original Sars-Cov-2.Well that is pretty early on , I guess that there has been a lot more research into it since then but I still think "a laboratory escape scenario cannot be excluded" even if it less likely than a zoonotic explanation.
The last bit of evidence I can find is from March last year which suggested raccoon dogs in the market were infected with the virus. This adds to the evidence of a natural spillover event
New Evidence Supports Animal Origin of COVID Virus through Raccoon Dogs
Genetic sequences show evidence of raccoon dogs and other animals at the Wuhan market sites where SARS-CoV-2 was found in early 2020, adding to evidence of a natural spillover eventwww.scientificamerican.com
What we do have are a lot of protest from virologists saying the pandemic was a natural spill over (zoonotic event) for their own reasons.
There is a conspiracy here. Peter Danzak is at the heart of it. These people want to be able to continue doing gain of function research in less than stellar lab security, so are left to manipulate non dangerous viruses to humans and make them dangerous. They do this because they say it will help us prepare for a pandemic. They caused one. They rubbish the obvious fact, that the virus emerged a few kilometers from a lab that has been doing genetic manipulation of Bat viruses related to Sars-Cov-2 since about 2017.
None of the research into market animals found Sars-Cov-2 IN animals on sale or the farms they came from. They DID find Sars-Cov-2 on some surfaces at the market, but by then, the virus was all over Wuhan. It had emerged in the human population in November 2019 and they were examining the market in January 2020. By then, you could find Sars-Cov- 2 in British sewage ponds, in Marks & Spencers, and all over the world. It doesn't mean it started outside China as the Chinese were saying in the presence of WHO officials, when the blamed New Zealand seafood at the Wuhan market.
Early on, Peter Danzak organised a group of prominent virologists to sign a letter condemning the lab leak theory as racist and unscientific. The problem is it was him that had applied for grants to do dangerous gain of function research on bat viruses at the Wuhan lab. He is up to his neck in that dangerous work AND the emergence of an invented disease that killed millions of people world wide and wrecked economies and led to never before seen infringements of our liberty.
Gain of function viral research needs to be banned world wide. We got lucky this time. It could have been far worse. Sars-Cov-2 (world wide) at the start of the pandemic, was killing about 3% of those infected. It was much lower in richer countries, but still extremely serious, and it wasn't just ancient old folk who were badly affected. Just ask Derek Draper's wife. How about the escape of a virus which had the fatality rates of the rabbit virus myxomatosis, which when it first emerged killed 98% of the infected animals. This COULD happen if we don't regulate that kind of virology work to the maximum extent. All it takes is the right virus and a sloppy, tired worker to infect himself accidentally and then go home on the bus.
Last edited: