I don't think they have a chance in hell of changing the law for their scooters, certainly not within a year.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46103713
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46103713
100% agreeThere's no chance, too many other implications, for example the ban on Segways.
.
True, unless they are registered as mopeds and only used on roads.Hold on, how does this fit in with all those posts on here where it has been said that unregistered S-pedelecs, bikes over 250W and others not strictly conforming with the EAPC regulations are always illegal to use, even on private land with the owner's permission, if the public has access to that land?
AFAIK QE Olympic Park is accessible to the public 24/7?
The DfT can give such a permission for a trial. You may remember we had a DfT waiver for using 250 watt pedelecs between 13th April 2013 and 6th April 2015 while the law said 200 watts was the maximum.Absolutely flecc
But the point being made is that there is a trial and is, apparently, illegal
How does that work ?!
But a cheeky chappy might find himself a regretful chappy after being on the receiving end of a bunch of fives as proof.Ahh, thanks
A cheeky chappy might ask them to prove they have such a dispensation!
But that previous waiver was a general waiver, nationwide. Surely it's unlikely that the DfT would give a waiver to one, specific, commercial company?The DfT can give such a permission for a trial. You may remember we had a DfT waiver for using 250 watt pedelecs between 13th April 2013 and 6th April 2015 while the law said 200 watts was the maximum.
.
They are illegal, but the DfT or even the transport minister can issue permission for a defined trial/test/event.But that previous waiver was a general waiver, nationwide. Surely it's unlikely that the DfT would give a waiver to one, specific, commercial company?
OR were some of those previous posts telling us of the illegality just incorrect?