"The risk at low cadences is more a matter of joint damage, particularly the knees which cyclists often damage." etc
Hi Flecc
Just interested to know if there's any published evidence for this especially the later arthritis.
BW
Keith
There's a shortage of conclusive evidence for causation, but an abundance of associated evidence, including much online.
What is certain is that arthritis, which is wear damage, is normal and very common in older age. It doesn't suddenly appear, it very gradually develops with joint wear and when any discomfort is first felt the condition is already well established. Excessive use or loading at any stage during that development considerably worsens the condition by accelerating the wear.
Anterior knee indications are particularly prevalent among sport cyclists and the severity of their subsequent late arthritis well known, indicating it's due to excessive loading. My one time keen cyclist brother is one such case, the arthritis in his right knee forcing him to give up all cycling. The damage was so great that the joint would at times totally lock into one position. He's lived with anti-inflammatories and pain killers for years now. He freely admits that his preference was often for slow cadence slogging on climbs during long Audax rides and the like.
For me as for many, the evidence has easily been sufficient to always in high load situations like climbing use the higher cadences which reduce the pressure on each pedal stroke.
.