I can't see that is a problem. The law permits a maximum of 500 watt rating for S pedelecs but manufacturers have settled on 350 watts rating since that's the public's popular choice for optimum performance/range. With a 350 watt rating making about 700 watts peak possible, a cyclist will only need to put in 175 watts to achieve that, comfortably within the 200 watts an average person can output for hours rather than the minutes needed to get peak powers.Sometime soon the European Commission will be reviewing this requirement, which stipulates that the power of speed pedelecs should be no more than 4 times the power, which the cyclist puts into the bike him/herself.
That might not be the worry it looks like in the surface. It's not just BMW using very different cells, Nissan and Renault have always done so on their e-cars, making their own batteries.
- As cell switch to 21700 format BMZ see 5200mah being the near future standard cell.
Car makers kicked off modern e-bikes.Interesting to read more automotive component manufacturers are building ebike motors, Brose make car seat motors, Bionx was for a time owned by Magna.
Seems a bit high to me, Flecc. I would say than an average ebiker (guys on this forum) would be in the range 60 to 100 watts and maybe 200w for a very short time to climb a steep hill.a cyclist will only need to put in 175 watts to achieve that, comfortably within the 200 watts an average person can output for hours rather than the minutes needed to get peak powers.
.
I was speaking of an average fitness man, said to be capable of 200 watts for a couple of hours and 300 watts for ten minutes. A few e-bikers may be well below that capability, but I don't think most are too far off the common levels of fitness.Seems a bit high to me, Flecc. I would say than an average ebiker (guys on this forum) would be in the range 60 to 100 watts and maybe 200w for a very short time to climb a steep hill.
lol, cos your local politicians are doing such a good job of sorting out the eBike rules aren't they.not sure i like the sound of this..
"In a second presentation, Bram Rotthier of the Belgian University of Leuven, explained his findings on the requirement of factor 4 for speed pedelecs. Sometime soon the European Commission will be reviewing this requirement, which stipulates that the power of speed pedelecs should be no more than 4 times the power, which the cyclist puts into the bike him/herself. In anticipation of the Commission’s review and for his PhD-thesis at KU Leuven, Bram Rotthier has done scientific research into factor 4. "
http://onlinemagazine.bike-eu.com/nr1#!/e-bike-rules-evoke-lots-of-questions
that`s the trouble with the EU, too many people hanging around with too much time on their hands, and then mischief ensues.
Yep!...faceless bureaucrats in Brussels telling us what to do, when to do it, and how much it will cost you!
Roll on March 29th!
Well hopefully after March 29th everything surrounding ebikes will be sorted out to the benefit of UK residents, including the cheap chinese tat thats imported, assembled and then sold off as `Made in Germany` by unscrupulous Dealers!lol, cos your local politicians are doing such a good job of sorting out the eBike rules aren't they.
We don't need it sorting, we just operate lawlessly:Well hopefully after March 29th everything surrounding ebikes will be sorted out to the benefit of UK residents
Actually no... don't agree with any of that. I'm not aware of any dealers in Germany, unscrupulous or otherwise who import chinese tat. There are very strong EU rules protecting the "Made in Germany" tag. Just like it protects the Made in Austria that KTM can use.Well hopefully after March 29th everything surrounding ebikes will be sorted out to the benefit of UK residents, including the cheap chinese tat thats imported, assembled and then sold off as `Made in Germany` by unscrupulous Dealers!
wouldn`t you agree?!
I like this last line:
I thought that was we were aiming for by trying to get stronger links with the US?I like this last line:
"The greatest benefit for all comes when trading partners concentrate on their own core strengths."
Can the UK find a market for ignorance?
.
The Act insisted all manufactured goods were labelled with their country of origin, not just German goods.Actually no... don't agree with any of that. I'm not aware of any dealers in Germany, unscrupulous or otherwise who import chinese tat. There are very strong EU rules protecting the "Made in Germany" tag. Just like it protects the Made in Austria that KTM can use.
I actually learnt last month whilst over in Germany, when I asked why the factory next to the one I was in had "MADE IN GERMANY" in massive letters on the side, in English. I asked why it wasn't "Hergestellt in Deutschland" why it is in English. I was informed with a smile that it was the English that did it. They made things have the Made in Germany tag in the past, because we arrogant Brits considered it a negative, so it would help us sell our things preferentially... how wrong that move was hey.
I checked... and its correct.
http://www.dw.com/en/125-years-of-made-in-germany/a-16188583
Yes, but it was a British Act... which was my point. I wasn't really saying it was aimed at specifically at Germany was I? I was simply repeated what I was told by a German factory that the "Made in Germany" tag came about because of the British, and the Germans are now very happy about that, more so than the British I suspect.The Act insisted all manufactured goods were labelled with their country of origin, not just German goods.
You may wish to swallow the opinion of a German website the Act was 'aimed' at Germany because it fits your 'knock, knock, knock' agenda.
As an importer of manufactured goods you are also fearful of Brexit because, selfishly, it may impact adversely on your business.
Nothing wrong with that, we are all selfish.
But everyone should be aware your posts are nothing more than axe grinding and should be viewed as such.