Hi d8veh, tell you what you are right about Storck ebikes, maybe they are keeping a low profile.Well, I yawned my way through most of it. They didn't really have anything new. It was OK to read for nothing, but I can't see why anyone would want to pay £3 a copy (or more) for stuff that you can find on the internet for nothing. The reviews don't really tell you any of the details that allow you to make clear decision points about whether to buy. What was the point of telling us that the Audi weighs 11Kg without the electrical stuff without mentioning what the total is? It's like saying, "my bike only weighs 50g if you don't include everything attached to the wheel spindle". Why didn't they mention more relevant stuff like how big/heavy the battery is or how long it will last when drawing the maximum 2.3 kw?
And comments from the Raleigh bloke make me feel sick. He says that if you don't spend £2000 to £3000, your bike will break down after a short time, except that their bikes from £1000 are OK.
Why was there an article about Presteigne to get all the juices going when the event doesn't exist anymore?
I can virtually guarantee that there'll be a review of a Storck bike within the next couple of issues. We haven't heard from them for a while. Are they still going?
I think I'm becoming a grumpy old man, but I wish them luck.
Try Colin Woolley - colin@cyclingworldmag.co.uk (not correct person but should hopefully be able to direct you to correct individual).I have tried contacting them from the e mail link on their website, I will update if I get an answer
Phil
I went for a test ride on a Raleigh, and a few other makes when I was trying to decide what to buy. The Raleigh motor didn't sound too good to my then inexperienced ears. After a few hundred metres there was a loud bang and the motor failed. So much for Raleigh reliability then!Well, I yawned my way through most of it. They didn't really have anything new. It was OK to read for nothing, but I can't see why anyone would want to pay £3 a copy (or more) for stuff that you can find on the internet for nothing. The reviews don't really tell you any of the details that allow you to make clear decision points about whether to buy. What was the point of telling us that the Audi weighs 11Kg without the electrical stuff without mentioning what the total is? It's like saying, "my bike only weighs 50g if you don't include everything attached to the wheel spindle". Why didn't they mention more relevant stuff like how big/heavy the battery is or how long it will last when drawing the maximum 2.3 kw?
And comments from the Raleigh bloke make me feel sick. He says that if you don't spend £2000 to £3000, your bike will break down after a short time, except that their bikes from £1000 are OK.
Why was there an article about Presteigne to get all the juices going when the event doesn't exist anymore?
I can virtually guarantee that there'll be a review of a Storck bike within the next couple of issues. We haven't heard from them for a while. Are they still going?
I think I'm becoming a grumpy old man, but I wish them luck.
That was a lot of adverts and not much else.
Had a reply from Colin this morning, seems his phone line is down and they will post me the missing November issue. All's well that ends well.Try Colin Woolley - colin@cyclingworldmag.co.uk (not correct person but should hopefully be able to direct you to correct individual).
Hope this helps.
DW
Do't know about ebikes? They speak well about the motor on the Birdy, but I am sure it is purely manually powered. I fancy having one.I bought the hardcopy mag in WHS, as it was bundled with Cycling World & found the latter a far better read than the eBike mag. It's far too generalised & lacking in the meaty stuff - Struck me that it's written by people who don't know much at all about eBikes.
I think that the motor was hidden on another bike.Unsurprisingly the pictures showed a very well hidden motor and battery!
'Grumpy Old Man' - you, Dave? Shurely shum mishtake.Well, I yawned my way through most of it. They didn't really have anything new. It was OK to read for nothing, but I can't see why anyone would want to pay £3 a copy (or more) for stuff that you can find on the internet for nothing. The reviews don't really tell you any of the details that allow you to make clear decision points about whether to buy. What was the point of telling us that the Audi weighs 11Kg without the electrical stuff without mentioning what the total is? It's like saying, "my bike only weighs 50g if you don't include everything attached to the wheel spindle". Why didn't they mention more relevant stuff like how big/heavy the battery is or how long it will last when drawing the maximum 2.3 kw?
And comments from the Raleigh bloke make me feel sick. He says that if you don't spend £2000 to £3000, your bike will break down after a short time, except that their bikes from £1000 are OK.
Why was there an article about Presteigne to get all the juices going when the event doesn't exist anymore?
I can virtually guarantee that there'll be a review of a Storck bike within the next couple of issues. We haven't heard from them for a while. Are they still going?
I think I'm becoming a grumpy old man, but I wish them luck.