I was responding to your sentence towards the end of #8 "Many ebikes assist all the time, which is a complete waste of power", and where you go on to say "I don't see the point of assisting where..." etc..
My generalised response is think more widely than your own riding! My impression is that you are perhaps somewhat younger than I, and perhaps not yet feeling the slowing down effects of declining lung function as years advance! Low level assistance all the time below 15.5mph is exactly what I want and need, and given what it lets me achieve, I don't see it as a waste.
Using different assistance levels as needed - as low as possible on a long trip, as high as I like for shopping and commuting - means that the energy is used in a targeted way, I am faster than without assistance, I never have to work harder than I can manage, and I no longer need my car, despite my youthful vigour having receded.
Ebikes as transport rather than just sport are a huge step forward in sustainability, as potentially are (dare I mention them?) Escooters. Users have different needs, and it is not for me to tell another rider their approach is wrong.
What I was getting at with my previous response is that both cadence and torque sensor control systems only assist if the rider pedals, so not all the time. Throttles are different, but you are right, I did not explain it clearly enough. What I meant - and perhaps I am generalizing now - was that most pedelec riders who want a throttle don't want to pedal at all, they just want to use the throttle. Which if the requirements to have that capability have been met, is fine by me. Again, it is extending affordable and sustainable transport to more and more people.