I agree with you Artsu, it is very frustrating when you know the bike can go much faster but is limited. I can only assume they put in the limit for safety reason ie a 14 year old can legally ride one? But then again I heard that you can legally install a more powerful motor and use it on the road but it needs to be registered, insured and checked just like a Moped.
That is exactly what I want from an ebike. Go faster but with less effort.
I believe it's a challenge to get the bikes with more powerful motors registered, insured, MOT'd when they are self-build / kit bikes. By no means an easy route - but the "S-Pedelec" type bikes are so crazily expensive you have to shell out a lot to get one that can be readily prepared to be registered as a motor vehicle with a few extra things done to it.
To be completely honest using an eBike at 16-23mph is no different to riding a regular bicycle for a fit cyclist. Speed/climbing ability off a 350-500W motor don't result in bikes going faster than unpowered bikes with fit young riders on them except on steep hills - and there, speed is likely 15mph or less anyway so no more unsafe. However, powerful motors have more acceleration potential and if not used responsibly they could be argued to be inherently more dangerous and therefore should only be ridden by people with the experience to control that. Save for this last consideration, there's not really any justification logically for electric vehicles assisting up to about 23mph being treated any differently to unpowered bicycles.
Banning them from trails is pretty ridiculous - conditions dictate speed off-road more than anything - just because you climb faster than the MTB purists doesn't mean you DH any faster. I read some place in the States was more worried about "hapless eBikers" being likely to need rescuing if they ran out of battery and therefore should be banned otherwise they would risk wasting Rangers' time. Well, I suppose they have a point in a way. But it's more that the 'trail lycra mafia' want the place to themselves and don't want more people there, especially not unless they're hardcore trail riders like themselves ! One tends to forget that not everyone applies common sense to how and where they ride their bikes. Lowest common denominator sets the lines on that front !
A throttle assist bike doesn't mean you can't pedal - it's just that you don't always have to if you don't want to. A throttle will only deliver so much power as you use with it so if you only want a light assistance you only have to apply it a small amount. In principle, basic hub motor conversions are simple and pretty inexpensive if you want a bike that can assist you above 15mph in normal conditions and choose the right controller, motor and battery. CST hub motors ride very much like normal bikes unpowered - a bit more effort needed maybe at lower speeds. You can then just add in as much throttle as you want - or if it's constant speed you're after fit a 2nd springless throttle as a speed control throttle. Bit more work but this is like a cruise control. You can then select the gearing you like to deliver as much pedal effort as you want and the motor only matches what you
don't put in to keep your speed constant. For people who are set on constant cadence cycling this is a heinous thought - but if you have an open mind about different riding styles, it's a very user-friendly function.
If you don't want a freewheel the CST motor is actually a very good option, can be reasonably easily restricted to 15.5mph and comes in 250W variants for those who want to tread a more compliant path - but it's usually quite a bit more expensive than standard BPM motors. Btw ... just so there's no misconception ... in basic principle, changing the wheel size on a Bosch system to make it assist faster does not get around the technical requirement to register the bike as a vehicle, use with licence, insurance etc etc. It's no different to fitting a high powered unrestricted kit to a regular bike and not registering it.