Thanks, Flecc.Congratulations Rob, that's a great bike and a terrific hill climber. I also like the fact that it's different from the mainstream.
I have a static caravan in North Yorkshire, one of the smaller bikes will take up residence there for the summer.10-20 mile is my comfort zone for riding my brompton. I'd like to try 20 inch wheels as my ideal mileage is around 30-35 miles.
Would like a bike where the main frame folds though as I'm a train commuter.
Can the Brompton still justify it's place in the squad now Rob?
That's a good-looking bike and sounds ideal for what you're going to use it for. Still, it makes me realise what great value my Woosh Zephyr is with its full foldability (which I need) and full suspension (which I want) at about a third of the price.
I like your statements "proper play" and "new toy". I still use those terms in my 60's.. I Always say "I'm going to play out on the bike, see you later!" you would think I would have grown up a bit by now!And then there was three.
I am going out for my first proper play on the new toy shortly and will get some pics.
In the meantime, perhaps members would like to speculate on what I have bought.
All guesses - even serious ones - welcome.
I'm not sure that this is the case. I can understand the appeal of small wheeled compact bikes for people who need to travel by train or other forms of transport as part of their commute, but that isn't everyone. The small wheeled compact bikes come with disadvantages when compared to a full sized one and there is no point in accepting these disadvantages when it is not necessary to do so.small size bikes like the AVE MH-7 and the Kalkhoff Sahel ought to be more popular than the sport bikes.
Assistance transforms these small vehicles - they are generally lighter, more manoevrable in urban areas, easier to carry on cars, cheaper etc.. but why so many people choose a bike because it looks like a sporty (non-electric) cousin? mad.
I had the rest of the country in mind. I can see why they would be popular and advantageous in London with people squeezing into flats and being crammed onto trains and having limited storage options.I had Londoners in mind - cwah recently pointed out that he needed the bike to fit inside the lift. Another poster had to carry the bike up 3 flights of stairs.
Surely small form factor deserves more attention?
Needless to say, I agree - although only as of last week.I think the disadvantages of 20" wheels can be overplayed. Nearly 5.4 million of the original small wheeled Mini were produced and worked fine at up to 100 mph, or more on the race track. Countless millions of scooters and mopeds using much smaller than 20" wheels have been produced worldwide and work fine at speeds up to around 70mph.
On bikes there can be a very slight increase in roll resistance for a given tread, when compared with 26 to 28" wheels. Getting high enough gear ratios can challenge designers, but that isn't insoluble. A smaller front wheel alters bike handling characteristics, but for the better in some respects as much as for the worse in others.
I'm sure most of the disadvantages perceived by some are more due to cramped frame designs than to the wheel size, particularly true of many folders. If the frame geometry is right, a 20" wheel bike can easily compare with larger wheeled bikes for cycling pleasure.
It looks the businessAs promised, a few pics of the new bike - an AVE MH7 semi-folder.
View attachment 8303 View attachment 8302
View attachment 8301
View attachment 8304
That's it exactly Rob, smaller front wheel equals faster steering. In motorcycle racing such as Moto GP, for races at tracks with numerous twists and turns a smaller front wheel is fitted to give fast turning, for the very fast straighter tracks a larger front wheel for greater stability at high speed.The steering on the AVE tends slightly towards Brompton twitchiness.
Nice and direct, but many riders would prefer the steering of a bigger wheeled bike.