There’s an alternative view.
On this side of the Channel, the government probably doesn’t include any millionaires. It’s hard to tell, because the kind of detailed reporting of expenses, conflicts of interest and other measures to promote transparency now in place in Britain just don’t exist here. An attempt by some parliamentarians to introduce similar, although milder measures was heavily outvoted, on the basis that they attacked the right to personal privacy and encouraged voyeurism.
On the contrary, the government wants to squeeze the rich till their pips squeak. As a result many of them, some publicly but most discreetly, are leaving. Worse, large numbers of the educated and dynamic young, hoping someday to become seriously rich themselves, are also heading for fresher pastures.
It would seem that being millionaire-free does not of itself ensure an enhanced level of governmental competence. The President’s most notable achievement has been to score a lower level of popularity (30%) within the first year of office than any of his predecessors. I would venture to suggest that never in the field of politics have so many promises been broken so quickly- and cynically. The only thing that is growing is unemployment, fast rising towards 11%.
Many comfort themselves with reports on Britain showing that things are even worse there. There are others however who point out that at least the UK has had the gumption to start doing what France is incapable of: reducing public expenditure. If only it had been done ten years earlier, like in countries such as Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Austria, Finland… (the list is actually quite long but their success stories, sadly, are rarely mentioned in Britain) and where now reigns a sense of relative prosperity.
As you may gather, Moustache and I are grumpy. A sudden icy spell has nipped hopes that the much longed-for spring had arrived. Buds that burgeoned too soon will not live to see it. And it comes from the frozen North- thanks you guys! There’ll be no riding out today.