Thanks. Can't remember which article I read where it basically said hardtail electric bikes are pointless for rough tracks.
Sounds a bit of a dumb article given hardtails were the bike to have x number of moons ago, and just about every course from a day out to full on pro rode a hardtail on them. So some article claiming only bike is sus or nothing isnt worth the ink taken to print such nonsense out.
Full sus history is really centered around the concept and development of downhill, then FS became more user friendly with companies offering shorter travel(100mm) for cross country(XC) and general trail riding and its went on from there, the only developments were increased wheel diameter to roll better over larger rocks and roots as the technical skills of the riders developed. As time went on, travel increased, touted as the rider being able to take on more terrain and ride faster and harder.
Plus it made it easier and less demanding on the rider with the ability to soak up the hits without increasing fatigue becoming a chore.
But everything XC/trail started on HT's, as such they still have a place offroad, only maybe not as hard/fast or aggressive as the magazines like to wax lyrical about.
A HT has other benefits. Depending on which it can adapt to road, offroad, commuting, touring, its better for a rack and panniers, and if its just down to comfort then plenty of suspension seatposts available.
Heres a vid of an obviously skilled and experienced rider of suss riding an HT.
We can see its certainly a capable ride, and while I get the impression you arent going to be entering the megavalanche in the coming years, it does suggest that the type of offroad trail riding you're possibly associating with offroad its more than capable of achieving.