if you had sent woosh a questionaire, they apparently sell as many hub driven bikes as crank drive bikes.
Yep, and why wouldn't they.
Both systems have their advantages and disadvantages, and it's certainly not possible to state that one system is better than the other. It simply comes down to personal preference, and mine is for hub drive.
A possible issue with the Pro Connect 10 is that, being 10 gears, the chain would be narrower, and therefore more likely to break, given the high torque and strain from the Impulse 2 mid-motor.
You have edited out the comment that you made to being left stranded miles from anywhere with a snapped chain, but I really don't see why a ten speed chain would ever be likely to snap through normal use. I can't find any written evidence to back your claim up, but if as you say chains are snapping, then it would more than likely come down to poor quality original equipment, along with the possibility of poor gear selection.
I run ten speed chains, and mine probably have to put up with more arduous use in the space of just a few hundred miles, than most others are ever likely to put their chains through, after a life time of use.
Whilst I have worn chains out in mileage ranging anything from 100ish miles - 600miles, and cassettes and front sprockets in less than 600 miles, I have yet to have a chain snap.
It'll probably happen to me on the one day that I leave both my spare chain, chain tool, and spare snap links behind at home.
It's certainly no biggie if a chain did snap though, as it's just a couple of minutes work to replace a link, and I wouldn't be worrying about it.
The weak link for me, is the crank drive motor. The first bearing failure happened at roughly 600-650 miles, and the second bearing failure after a further 400 miles or so. By using your logic, that certainly doesn't make crank drive the better motor, and would make hub drive far superior.That damning and sweeping statement, would neither be correct or true.