Oh dear. I would draw your attention to this small print in the contract with Velosure ;-
https://www.velosure.co.uk/assets/pdf/06-2016/velosure_cycle_wording_v12.pdf
"2 Security requirements where the cycle is away from the insured location
Accidental damage or theft of the cycle whilst away from the insured location will only be covered in circumstances where:
a) the cycle is not left unattended ; or
b) the cycle is left unattended, but secured to an immovable object by an
approved lock through the frame and
c) any access to the cycle is effected by forcible and violent entry"
NOTE the link between items b and c above, i.e. the logic symbol "and". Also notice how they did not write "or" like they did between items a and b. So again, Velosure will NOT pay out if the public have access to your bike, no matter how well locked it is to any immovable object.
So if I leave my bike around town somewhere and it gets nicked, even if it's locked to e.g. a Council provided bike stand, then I'm stuffed. Since BOTH items b and c have to be true simultaneously before they will pay out.
I'll try the other suggestions (Zurich etc) later when I get a chance.
However this is the 2nd Electric Bicycle insurer which has this wording in their small print, and I am beginning to get the idea it's pretty standard in the insurance industry? At this point, not sure if I can get my e-bike insured at all against theft ?
Or am I misreading these legal document wordings?
Regards,
AG