I was going to post earlier but this thread has moved on a fair bit! I'm with Harry on this I don't buy the reasoning for the pricing strategy, the reason for using expensive cells is the regen function, but as we know regen on any bike is dubious no matter how you cut it. If you paid the cash and didn't find the function of any benefit then you have paid through the nose for just having the option of using regen. As I said before I'm sure the quality is first class but I would not pay for it. The cost and positioning seems delibrate but seemingly only to justify the function or functions that only a few will think of benefit.
Hi
Good reasoning I believe and an explanation for the positioning of the BionX product in the market. Each time I have spoken with an agent about the BionX kit the "advantages" of regeneration are quickly pointed out. It's clearly part of the marketing strategy.
I've also noticed that if I enquire about a particular e bike the agent, if he sells the BionX kit will also describe the kit. Once I mention that price is a barrier then I find the agent will quickly drop the subject. I have the feeling that they, like me, are not too convinced by the price structure.
Getting back to ready built with BionX does anyone know as to whether the Kalkhoff B27 and Trek T500 or T80 use the BionX battery?
Does the technology allow for an alternative battery?
I note that regeneration can be turned on/off and presumably can be disabled? If so, then would this allow for the fitting of an alternative, and hopefully cheaper battery?
So. it appears that the Trek and Kalkhoff with BionX power may be back in the frame however like you I 'm really not interested in regeneration.
Regards
vectra. (learning all the time from you guys).