Don't think I have ever seen one tbh. Used to have a bottle dynamo in not the best condition and that was quite the opposite of an electric motor ;DThat reminds me of those drum dynamo's, you bolted it on the bottom bracket and flicked a lever when you wanted to power up your lights. They tended not to slow you down as much as a bottle dynamo but again slippage was a problem in the wet, wonder if they still make them ?
Ah I see, it runs on the tyre in the same wayThey talk about them on this page, there's a piccy of one the same as I once had.
Does anyone still make a bottom bracket dynamo? - Bike Forums
Classic & Vintage - Does anyone still make a bottom bracket dynamo? - Im trying to help a friend power some lights on the cheap. Light theft is a big problem here, so I want to avoild a battery powered removable light. It seems like a bottom bracket dynamo might be the best route since building...www.bikeforums.net
He did - 12% hill at 4:50!wonder why he didn't do the test on a 10% hill.
2.147 microns of rubber would wear off per minute. After about 39 minutes, his legs would start to ache. Finally, after approximately 1 hour and 51 minutes, he'd have to get off and walk.that section lasted for 15 seconds.
what would happen to his tyres if he climbs a little longer?
The French, as ever, like to do things differently. Their Cybien-Sport has twin motors clamping the sides of the rear wheel on a rubberised rim section, driving it dynamo fashion.Ah I see, it runs on the tyre in the same way
I was going to throw out my old food mixer yesterday. Now I know what to do with it.The French, as ever, like to do things differently. Their Cybien-Sport has twin motors clamping the sides of the rear wheel on a rubberised rim section, driving it dynamo fashion. At 15.5 mph the motors release their grip on the tyre:
I reckon the heat from friction would melt the rubber on his tyre in about 3 minutes climbing.2.147 microns of rubber would wear off per minute. After about 39 minutes, his legs would start to ache. Finally, after approximately 1 hour and 51 minutes, he'd have to get off and walk.
Not a bad idea vfr, remember the Sinclair C5 used a washing machine motor !I was going to throw out my old food mixer yesterday. Now I know what to do with it.
Although it was later famously said that the C5 was powered by a washing machine motor, the motor was in fact developed from a design produced to drive a truck cooling fan. ... The C5's electronics were produced by MetaLab, a Sinclair spin-off.Not a bad idea vfr, remember the Sinclair C5 used a washing machine motor !
It would be interesting to know the law on driving a c5 nowadays?The Sinclair C5 was built at the Hoover washing machine factory in Merthyr Tydfil, Wales. The motor was I believe a Polymotor built in Italy but interestingly they also made washing machine motors for Hoover hence all the confusion. The bodywork was manufactured in Taiwan and the whole thing pieced together in Wales.
I have a small collection of original Sinclair radios including the Wrist Radio, apparently extremely rare. At one time I owned several of his ZX81 computers which I sold off to a University.
Paradoxically Sir Clive Sinclair's business ideas all went down the drain and he was given a £10.000 handshake by his Government backers, if I'd have had enough of his old stuff I could have made more money now by selling it than he ever did.
I'm pretty sure it was 12 mph, which was the law then.The C5 had a max speed of 15mph how convenient is that !