There's a couple of things about this forum which I find a little distasteful.
One is the inbuilt descriptive title which appears next to each member's name. ie, senior member, junior member, etc. I dislike that because it seems to infer some kind of hierarchy or pecking order based on...well, I'm not sure what exactly. I know some other internet forums operate a similar system but it's pointless.
My other complaint is that I dislike being "shouted down" as it were for holding an opinion on a matter. It's not like I'm some jumped-up, young whippersnapper who knows nothing and I must quote Flecc here:
"Sorry Indalo, but the truth is that the consumer is too ignorant of the facts to form a realistic judgement."
Far from being a young, argumentative whippersnapper, I've had a bus pass for a few years now and although my background is in engineering, I have actually some experience in the finances involved in running a business and I took that remark about the ignorant consumer to mean me.
Now, to get back to matters pertaining to this particular thread, I'm just glad I wasn't the one to point out to Flecc that the ADD on non-EU bikes ended last summer. I found that straight away on Google as I couldn't believe that 48.5% duty quoted by Flecc although it did run at that rate for quite some time evidently. As for the rest of the figures in Flecc's illustration, well the term, "creative accounting" springs to mind. Is there an importer who charges 15% on regular bikes and 100% mark-up on the powered variety? Or perhaps there's an importer who only deals in electric bikes with no other business?
Quoting Flecc again:
"So there you have it, £281 against £1954, all clear now?"
Emm, sorry Flecc but no, I haven't. If the situation for dealers is as tough as you imply, no-one would make any kind of living from selling electric bikes but perhaps they only do it out of the goodness of their hearts. Alternatively, these ebike shops might be a front to conceal drug importation for example but what do I know?
What I do know is that if you can be wrong on one fact, you might be wrong on lots of other facts. I don't doubt your great wisdom on many issues to do with bikes but you really ought to stop acting like an official spokesman for the ebike dealers and importers not to mention the battery manufacturers.
Can I just add Flecc that you were somewhat unfairly singularly dismissive of the work being done by MIT in the US. Perhaps you aren't fully aware of the progress being made there on Li-ion but it's not just stuff that the universities do. They are light years ahead of anybody else on the planet. Without breakthroughs made there in recent times, Li-ion technology was effectively stalled and may well have simply stagnated. It wasn't the manufacturers who discovered how to "split the atom" as it were; it was the collective genius of the research scientists at MIT, nowhere else.
If you wish to continue to pontificate about battery prices being reasonable, then perhaps you'd like to back up your contention with some more of your maths, showing everything from acquisition of raw materials through the manufacturing process all the way down to the consumer. My contention is that the consumer is being ripped off and most are riding around with old-hat, fairly basic Li-ion technology in their battery case rather than the latest variety which is only appearing on a few bikes now.
Indalo