Absolutely 100% spot on! Well said sir, always try before you buy.Moral of all this is make sure you try bike in environment you intend using it.
All the best, David
Absolutely 100% spot on! Well said sir, always try before you buy.Moral of all this is make sure you try bike in environment you intend using it.
Choke?So, it's really a device for throttling the power delivery. There's probably a word for that.....
Yes it is but only when operating within motors ideal operating rpm range.What you are essentially discussing is efficiency. I hate to tell you this, but a correctly designed DD motor is inherently more efficient than a variable geared system.
The following link is a long thread on ES that tears apart the old myth of the need for gearing with an electric drive:
https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=47930&sid=414ab6b2143d1222b0fcbcb27e9997e2
Just before I go.... from one of our stockists... unprompted....
"I have been riding electric bikes for many years but can honestly say the Wisper 705Torque is the most impressive bike I have ever ridden. The way it sailed up the steep Cornish hills on our scenic north Cornwall coast road recently was amazing. I am used to electric bike motors being quite noisy, but the 705Torque is almost silent. Its performance was also truly superb, not only did I pass many non electric bikes in the hills, but also easily overtook a couple of electric bikes! At the end of our hilly bike ride from Portreath to Hayle and back, a total of just under 20 miles, I had only used a quarter of my battery, which was amazing".
Just saying!
I know that hill in Castleton very well. Drove up and down it a few times but never cycled it. I'll give it a go later this year when i'm a bit fitter. It's slightly less steep than Cromford Hill
KevinI know that hill in Castleton very well. Drove up and down it a few times but never cycled it. I'll give it a go later this year when i'm a bit fitter. It's slightly less steep than Cromford Hill
The basic theory is that if you take the mass that would have been part of the extra drivetrain components and replace it with active motor mass, you will be better off.Yes it is but only when operating within motors ideal operating rpm range.
A car without a gearbox at a certain speed would be more efficient at its optinum speed..problem is we expect vehicles to operate over a massive speed range..hence gearbox becomes a necessary evil..
Yes its less so with electric motors but its still the case..
Take two identical so called 250w motors. Put one in a hub with a fixed ratio to back wheel. Put other in crank with facility of 10 ratios (or 20 with yam)
Are folk on here really trying to say the one with fixed ratio will prove the better solution.
Bosch and Yam have invested millions developing CD units ?? I suppose they have got it wrong ? Perhaps they should read forum ??
Thanks for the offer, I may take you up on that. I'll ask my brother to come along too. He has a Bosch CD and also couldn't get up Cromford Hill. I'll let you know.Kevin
I,m in Rotherham from early next week. We can meet up in Castleton sometime and do that climb together. If you wish have a go on mine to compare..
(Been around Lady Bower today, Winnats is not that far away)
That's another way exponents of hub drives have for saying you couldn't push pedals hard enough !!!The basic theory is that if you take the mass that would have been part of the extra drivetrain components and replace it with active motor mass, you will be better off.
It has already been stated that there is a lot of technical waffle in this thread and I am in agreement. It has moved far from its original point. The reason you were beat by the hill in your OP was due to the torque sensing control system and nothing else - when you needed the power most, you couldn't tell the motor to supply it.
Umm, not sure what the point you thought you were making there? Torque sensors are in no way unique to mid-drives.That's another way exponents of hub drives have for saying you couldn't push pedals hard enough !!!
Which is sort of why I wanted an ebike in first place. To help me press pedals down..???
No never !!!Umm, what was the point you thought you were making there? Torque sensors are in no way unique to mid-drives.
Exactly what you describe is the achilies heel of the torque sensor. It is not a fault though, just a feature by design.No never !!!
Point is if hub drive/ pressure pedal relationship is so high ie.needing more force than rider can supply when tired there is a fault somewhere..it totally negates point of ebike..if you can exert high torque at end of a ride you don't need an ebike do you !!
Not true, but I'll let you off. Winnats is a whole 300 feet more of climbing, and even with the more gentle gradients at the top and bottom included in my segment it has an average grade of 11% compared to Cromford at 9%. A whole different league really.I know that hill in Castleton very well. Drove up and down it a few times but never cycled it. I'll give it a go later this year when i'm a bit fitter. It's slightly less steep than Cromford Hill
The most gears an electric motor could sensibly make use of over a legal pedelec speed range of 5 to 15 mph is two.Take two identical so called 250w motors. Put one in a hub with a fixed ratio to back wheel.
That problem only relates to the hub-motor on a specific bike. If you had a hub-motor with more torque at 5 mph of which there's many, it wouldn't slow down and stall out.My problem was that I could not pedal hard enough to keep the speed above about 5mph, the sweet spot of the hub motor. Below 5 mph, the motor rapidly lost power and I knew that if I had the crank driver, I would have kept going without too much effort.
In short, the hub motor is only good for medium hills when it pulls like a train.