e-bikes tend to have better brakes, also riders give less attention to pedaling, more to observation.What makes you think they are less likely to be involved in accidents?
e-bikes tend to have better brakes, also riders give less attention to pedaling, more to observation.What makes you think they are less likely to be involved in accidents?
That's just nonsense.... "better brakes"... there is no such thing as an eBike specific brake, so they have the same brakes. They are also a lot heavier so even if they have "better brakes" the stopping distance will be greater.e-bikes tend to have better brakes, also riders give less attention to pedaling, more to observation.
I believe that they are comparatively safer due to the riding styles involved. Motor cut out itself provides a braking effect and more weight equals more drag. Spatial awareness is generally increased on an ebike. Acquiring a bit of speed on a regular bike requires a bit of head down, or up off the seat effort.That's just nonsense.... "better brakes"... there is no such thing as an eBike specific brake, so they have the same brakes. They are also a lot heavier so even if they have "better brakes" the stopping distance will be greater.
Don't try to make out eBikes are safer... they aren't. But equally, they aren't more dangerous.
They are just bikes, where the initial power is supported by a motor, this doesn't make then safer or more dangerous, which is why they are classified as bicycles.
They also encourage people to cycle who might not cycle normally... who aren't as aware of where they should be on the road.I believe that they are comparatively safer due to the riding styles involved. Motor cut out itself provides a braking effect and more weight equals more drag. Spatial awareness is generally increased on an ebike. Acquiring a bit of speed on a regular bike requires a bit of head down, or up off the seat effort.
Those efforts require time consuming, tunnel visioning rider input and the need to always be looking for a more linear path isn't necessary on an ebike. The ability to change course with relative ease and not being worried about losing speed, or having to crank it up for an oncoming hill, cannot be anything but a safety bonus.
Yes, they're just bicycles. It's that motorised support that you described that makes them different and for the best part safer.
the average e-bikes sell for a lot more money therefore tend to be better equipped.That's just nonsense.... "better brakes"... there is no such thing as an eBike specific brake, so they have the same brakes.
They also encourage people to cycle who might not cycle normally... who aren't as aware of where they should be on the road.
What you've described is achieved by being fit, so its not just an eBike benefit.
So yes I take you're point, but I think saying they are safer is missing the point slightly, its like saying a faster car is safer because it spends less time doing dangerous over takes...
Really! My overall perception of a lot of the bottom end ebikes is how terrible the brakes are. My MTB stops a lot quicker from 25-30 mph than my Haibike despite a 203mm brake upgrade. The MTB has 180 front and 160 rear but weighs nearly 15 kg less.the average e-bikes sell for a lot more money therefore tend to be better equipped.
you still have to factor in your own weight regarding stopping power. The difference in your case may be in favour of the normal bike but not a big difference.The MTB has 180 front and 160 rear but weighs nearly 15 kg less.
Agree with all of that, however London isn't the whole of the UK. I cringe when I see some of the ebikes and ebikers around me in the UK. So many people both here in Austria and in the UK can now get into situations that they can't handle because the powered bike gets them to the top of the hill.you still have to factor in your own weight regarding stopping power. The difference in your case may be in favour of the normal bike but not a big difference.
When you evaluate the general risk say in riding along with other people, do you feel safer with a bunch of pedelecers or normal cyclists?
I know in London, the normal cyclists are more of a menace than a bunch of pensioners on their e-bikes.
I thought we were dicussing the average risk. Riding as a sport has its own risk. Don't those ride as a sport activity have top notch e-bikes?So many people both here in Austria and in the UK can now get into situations that they can't handle because the powered bike gets them to the top of the hill.
I'm not necessarily on about sport, there are plenty of people having serious accidents on roads with relatively shallow gradients. Sadly a few weeks ago a German lady holidaymaker was killed when a car underestimated the speed a couple of ebikers were going and cut in to avoid an oncoming car.the driver didn't stop and as far as I know has not been found.I thought we were dicussing the average risk. Riding as a sport has its own risk. Don't those ride as a sport activity have top notch e-bikes?
I am looking to change forks on my MTBs to QR15 system.
When going uphill, e-bikes don't go over 15mph, that's not fast.This is the downside of going faster, it takes a vehicle longer to overtake.
15 mph is a lot faster than someone on a standard bike when going uphill. A driver sees a bike and thinks 7 mph max up here I can get past no problem before that car coming the other way and takes twice as long to get past!When going uphill, e-bikes don't go over 15mph, that's not fast.
Whereas on flat roads or downhill, is it not true that cyclists on normal bikes are faster?