As much as I loathe the attitudes thatcho put into this country and I am no Conservative I don't think she was necessarily being anti-cycling, more anti public transport.Stigma - what I mean is the Thatcher gov from the early 80's. Thatcher stated that if you are a man over the age of 26 and still take the bus to work, then you are a failure! (in other words, you should have it 'made' and driving an exec motor by that stage in your life).
At the same time Norman Tebbit said
"I grew up in the '30s with an unemployed father. He didn't riot. He got on his bike and looked for work, and he kept looking 'til he found it."
which is where the oft spun/misquoted "on yer bike" comment comes from, in fact Steve Bell used to portray Tebbit on the sort of 1970/80s 10-15 speed tourer, wearing the "pants of power" outside his cycling shorts..
To be fair there are a fair few Tories who cycle and see it as a "libertarian personal choice" and aren't against it but are still unwilling to support what they consider to be "extra" public money being spent on cycling.
and in Britain we wonder why we always seem to miss out or lose our lead on emerging business markets.Current cycle shop attitudes - i asked many of the leading NI cycle shops, would they be interested in selling me an e kit?
NO! Not enough money making in it for them, plus one Giant outlet manager said 'I'm a cycle mechanic, not an electronic one'.........can someone tell me what's wrong with that statement!
I have to be careful what I say due to still being under Official Secrets Act, but I once I worked in a similar Civil Service role on the UK mainland, and they had a cycle to work scheme years before it was released to the private sector - in fact it was what got me back into regular cycling.Here's one for you - certain Gov depts concerned with environment, don't even have a cycle to work scheme! Something to do with it being too complicated with the salaries branch.
The reality is that implementing the scheme isn't "complicated" but requires extra resource, and everything is being outsourced, downsized or scaled back - both in public and private sectors. I work in a finance role myself (today in the private sector) and if I was asked to look into the "cycle to work scheme" for staff would say, truthfully, that I do not as yet have the admin resources to support this, and my employers only have about 150 staff..
Also, the fact that in your area a stubborn minority of people seem very determined to repeat the mistakes of the past and thus obviously increase Civil Service security costs unfortunately makes a lot of difference as to what government intiatives get implemented and which ones get shelved, of course "security comes first".
Last edited: