To meet a few points in one: In the one article i'm focused on those at the table in the highest level of discussion around the matter; those in the room on the day are what I can report on. The fact that nobody there, arguably bar Ben at PedalMe, had much to say on the need for 500W is, likely not representative of the entirety of the market. I know it's not, you only need spend 5 mins on any given forum to see that. Yet the fact remains, no hard line pro 500W advocate has stepped forward publicly and given their view, or at least nobody in the room in Parliament had yet come across/was willing to share the source. We can speculate and give opinion til the cows come home, of course, but that's outside of my remit and, dare i say, would call more criticism above and beyond that given of the facts of the day.
As an FYI - articles exist on CE that do explain things like throttles, type approval, modification/tampering etc. All covered off individually, with expert insights, but not featured in detail within each piece written.
As @flecc has mentioned many times our governments are very proud of the UK's road safety records (one of the best in the world)Since virtually any able bodied young man can ride a bicycle twenty miles in an hour, the big mistake was in ever attempting to regulate mildly assisted bicycles at all. By what right in conscience does government interfere with the right of its more aged citizens to progress about the roads on their business on lightweight bicycles? It isn't human powered or light weight, mildly electric powered transport which is killing people every day on our roads. It is heavy motor vehicles. These laws and ridiculous regulations are simply an interfering, nanny state imposition on free people and they are demanded and supported by sheep.
Politicians need to focus on stopping a high probability of serious harm.
A five hundred watt e-bike is significantly less powerful and a lot lighter than a conventional moped. It also can achieve only a significantly lower speed than a 'moped'. Furthermore, the cause of most two wheeled accidents, including 50 horse power motorbikes, is terrible driving by car and truck drivers. Most motorcyclists killed are killed by car drivers pulling onto roads immediately in front of them. Most bicycle riders who die on the roads are killed by being crushed under trucks and cars. THESE are the vehicles we need to control.not piffling powered e-bikes.As @flecc has mentioned many times our governments are very proud of the UK's road safety records (one of the best in the world)
"Eager to encourage two wheels to get drivers out of cars, long ago they decided that since mopeds were fairly slow and car drivers were already safety tested, they could be trusted on one. So they added a Group P for 30 mph mopeds automatically to all car driving licences.
The result was that a lot more mopeds appeared on the roads but the accidents shot up, so they put a stop to that on 1st February 2001. The existing drivers kept that group P but from that date on anyone taking a car test no longer got the bonus group P."
I think flecc had mentioned that since then the Dft have been very wary of relaxing regulations that could cause a spike in accidents
Because they don't want to bring in legislation that they think risks a big increase in road accidentsA five hundred watt e-bike is significantly less powerful and a lot lighter than a conventional moped. It also can achieve only a significantly lower speed than a 'moped'. Furthermore, the cause of most two wheeled accidents, including 50 horse power motorbikes, is terrible driving by car and truck drivers. Most motorcyclists killed are killed by car drivers pulling onto roads immediately in front of them. Most bicycle riders who die on the roads are killed by being crushed under trucks and cars. THESE are the vehicles we need to control.not piffling powered e-bikes.
Why this is not obvious to the pernickety control freaks eludes me.
as soon as you allow 500W EAPC, they'll go on the pavement and shared paths. They can already type approved as motorbikes. Number plate, insurance, helmet.A five hundred watt e-bike is significantly less powerful and a lot lighter than a conventional moped. It also can achieve only a significantly lower speed than a 'moped'. Furthermore, the cause of most two wheeled accidents, including 50 horse power motorbikes, is terrible driving by car and truck drivers. Most motorcyclists killed are killed by car drivers pulling onto roads immediately in front of them. Most bicycle riders who die on the roads are killed by being crushed under trucks and cars. THESE are the vehicles we need to control.not piffling powered e-bikes.
Why this is not obvious to the pernickety control freaks eludes me.
But this is already against the law. If people riding on the pavement is the core of the problem, why not outlaw bikes altogether. There. That would solve it wouldn't it. I hate these pavement riders, except those who are young children, or who are riding slowly on an empty pavement alongside a dangerously crowded and busy road.as soon as you allow 500W EAPC, they'll go on the pavement and shared paths. They can already type approved as motorbikes. Number plate, insurance, helmet.
Can you define what a a 500w ebike is? How much power does it make or consume? How big is it? How heavy is it? How fast does it go?A five hundred watt e-bike is significantly less powerful and a lot lighter than a conventional moped. It also can achieve only a significantly lower speed than a 'moped'. Furthermore, the cause of most two wheeled accidents, including 50 horse power motorbikes, is terrible driving by car and truck drivers. Most motorcyclists killed are killed by car drivers pulling onto roads immediately in front of them. Most bicycle riders who die on the roads are killed by being crushed under trucks and cars. THESE are the vehicles we need to control.not piffling powered e-bikes.
Why this is not obvious to the pernickety control freaks eludes me.
This is not sensible. It isn't the bikes that cause the accidents. It is bad driving of heavier motor vehicles.Because they don't want to bring in legislation that they think risks a big increase in road accidents
You are of course right to point out the problem of how the power of an assisting motor is defined. I have read and taken in your several posts on this subject. i defer to your expertise on the matter.Can you define what a a 500w ebike is? How much power does it make or consume? How big is it? How heavy is it? How fast does it go?
That's effectively what the existing legislation does nowI don't even care about the legislation which restricts pedelecs to 15.4 miles an hour. Not all of the UK is flat like London and Cambridge. A very large part of it is very hilly and here more powerful assistance would be a great benefit - restict the top speed as now.
It is obvious to them, but apparently not obvious to you.A five hundred watt e-bike is significantly less powerful and a lot lighter than a conventional moped. It also can achieve only a significantly lower speed than a 'moped'. Furthermore, the cause of most two wheeled accidents, including 50 horse power motorbikes, is terrible driving by car and truck drivers. Most motorcyclists killed are killed by car drivers pulling onto roads immediately in front of them. Most bicycle riders who die on the roads are killed by being crushed under trucks and cars. THESE are the vehicles we need to control.not piffling powered e-bikes.
Why this is not obvious to the pernickety control freaks eludes me.
All that matters (legislation wise) is what is stamped on the motor and the speed assist limit. The amount of power the controller supplies to the motor is not controlled by any legislation - 500 Watts input power is quite low for hilly areas - I don't know if you are using a 36V or 48V system but @guerney has his parameters optimised for hill climbingAll I can say is that as a pretty fit 73 year old, my Bafang BBS 01 will just about get me up some of the hills around where I live which have gradients in which I have to climb 300 feet in well less than a mile. I probably benefit from getting pretty out of breath on these climbs. Using my outfit's screen it looks like when I press my throttle lever that I get access to more power and the screen shows something like 500 watts input power - a touch more, but to be honest, I am working pretty hard at these times and can't quite see it, because I am out of the seat and pedalling all I can so my view is less than perfect. My bike is set up to not exceed 250 watt input power in its pedal assist mode, but the throttle accesses more. I know that you can buy a cable to adjust parameters. I have not done it. I know that you have raised issues relating to what 250 watts means. All I have to go on is my screen and teh stamp on the motor unit.
That's one example. Here's another:You are of course right to point out the problem of how the power of an assisting motor is defined. I have read and taken in your several posts on this subject. i defer to your expertise on the matter.
All I can say is that as a pretty fit 73 year old, my Bafang BBS 01 will just about get me up some of the hills around where I live which have gradients in which I have to climb 300 feet in well less than a mile. I probably benefit from getting pretty out of breath on these climbs. Using my outfit's screen it looks like when I press my throttle lever that I get access to more power and the screen shows something like 500 watts input power - a touch more, but to be honest, I am working pretty hard at these times and can't quite see it, because I am out of the seat and pedalling all I can so my view is less than perfect. My bike is set up to not exceed 250 watt input power in its pedal assist mode, but the throttle accesses more. I know that you can buy a cable to adjust parameters. I have not done it. I know that you have raised issues relating to what 250 watts means. All I have to go on is my screen and teh stamp on the motor unit.
The quoted hill mentioned above though is not evenly steep, it is a series of steep and less steep parts. This isn't even the worst hill either. It is simply the one I have taken the trouble to measure with a gps regarding its length and height. If I want to go south out of the South Tyne valley, the hill tops out at over a 1100 feet asl. To the north it is 800 feet asl. The river is at about 300 feet, and my interest in this thread is that people living in such an area and there are plenty, would benefit from supplemental power at a higher level.