Dahon MU conversion update

homemoz

Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2007
181
168
UK
It's been a while since I've wriiten on this forum but as they say - new year new start!

Back in July 2008, I wrote a review of my Dahon MU Conversion by CH White & Son. Two years down the line since getting the bike, thought it was time for an update.

Firstly the the bike has been used regularly in all seasons including torrential rain and freezing weather, so far with 100% reliability. The NIMH battery is starting to lose range - now give me about 12 miles using the throttle and pedalling, but I have bought a back up LiFePo4 battery with a range of about 20 miles.

Since, buying the Dahon, I experimented with a Wisper 905eco having read the posts on this forum & thinking that perhaps I was missing something! Anyway, the Wisper has now been sold on as the Dahon is more suited to my needs. For example, more convenient storage in the limited space I have and the convenience of easily putting it in the back of the car whenever I need.

In my original review, I was critical of the throttle system, thinking that a pedelec system might be less hassle. However, having tried a pedelec, I have come round to liking the control and flexibility that the throttle gives, rather than power being there all the time. The criticism, I do have is that I still think that the throttles on these bikes could be more ergonomically designed for prolonged use.

Although CH White & Son no longer use the MU as a conversion, I notice that they are still using Dahon & Dawes bike with a more powerful motor system & lithium battery. When I bought my bike from them, there was little choice of good quality electric folders. That seems to have changed over the past year. I also notice that CH White & Son now do a Brompton conversion, which has received little (if any) comment on this forum.

So, how do I feel about the bike now? Basically, the more I have used the Dahon, the more I have come to appreciate it. It is a lovely bike to ride with or without electric power and is stylish and most of all reliable. The only things I have had done are an annual service & replacing the tyres with Marathon Plus after a couple of punctures.

In my original review, I gave the bike 7.5 out of 10. I reckon this was harsh & if I was to write the review again in light of my experience over the past couple of years would up this to at least 8.5 and possibly 9 out of 10.

Be interesting to know the experiences of others with these bikes.
 

Artstu

Esteemed Pedelecer
Aug 2, 2009
2,420
925
I'd love to see some photos please? and a little more detail about the set-up.

Thanks
 

daniel.weck

Esteemed Pedelecer
Aug 8, 2009
1,229
2

homemoz

Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2007
181
168
UK
No I didn't sell it - there was no interest from the pedelec site & I didn't want to put it on ebay. When I got the Wisper, I thought I would run both for a while & see what happened. Although, the Wisper was a decent bike, I actually found that I preferred the Dahon. Just the convenience really, for example when I take the car in for a service, I can just put the Dahon in the back and cycle home - about 8 miles. I just couldn't do that with the Wisper.

I also found the Dahon exactly the right size for me (I'm 5ft 8ins). There was also the hassle of having 2 sets of batteries, chargers etc lying around the house. In the end it just made more sense to keep the folder. Although, I know that the general view is that full size bikes are better to ride. I just don't find that the case. I have tried a number of smaller wheeled bike & in fact we still have an ancient Brompton in the understairs cupboard, but the Dahon 20" with wheels seem just about right. Folding isn't so easy, but I guess you can't have everything!

I'll have a go with photos when we've finished decorating in the kitchen this afternoon! Although last time I tried, I got a message about file size being too large (even with them reduced). If anyone know what I did wrong, please let me know.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,203
30,604
I'll have a go with photos when we've finished decorating in the kitchen this afternoon! Although last time I tried, I got a message about file size being too large (even with them reduced). If anyone know what I did wrong, please let me know.
Make sure you save them as JPG (limit 97.7 kB), not JPEG (limit 19.5 kB). Also reduce their dimensions to a reasonable size like 800 pixels wide or less. Modern high megapixel count digital cameras can produce massive images, physically far too large for many who use low or moderate screen resolutions on their computers. Compressing those first to low file sizes can destroy the quality, so the physical size reduction is best done first before saving with compression.
.
 

homemoz

Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2007
181
168
UK
Well, have tried converting the files with iPhoto with no success. They are in JPEG form & don't seem to have a facility for exporting to JPG. May have a go another day, but that's enough for now!
 

jerrysimon

Esteemed Pedelecer
Aug 27, 2009
3,292
112
Cambridge, UK
Why don't you try uploading them to Flickr first and then use the insert image button at the top when you are creating a new post (the one with the mountain icon), to link to them from there to your posts here.

There is then no size restriction.

Regards

Jerry
 
Last edited: