How is that a false link? Covid seems to get discussed in the brexit thread far more than it does in this one.Your false link posts have been reported to Admin.
.
How is that a false link? Covid seems to get discussed in the brexit thread far more than it does in this one.Your false link posts have been reported to Admin.
.
Don't try to play the innocent. It's a link on the cabinet office subject hat you've altered to lead to your post on the German Covid restrictions.How is that a false link? Covid seems to get discussed in the brexit thread far more than it does in this one.
YOU'RE trying to change the subject, falsely accusing me of falsehoods - see your original objection. Again, Covid gets discussed far more in the brexit thread of late, and by more people, than it does here.Don't try to play the innocent. It's a link on the cabinet office subject hat you've altered to lead to your post on the German Covid restrictions.
.
How is the cabinet office fine subject that you used as a false link anything to do with the Covid post you linked it to? Clearly it's you changing the subject within one post.YOU'RE trying to change the subject, falsely accusing me of falsehoods - see your original objection. Again, Covid gets discussed far more in the brexit thread of late, and by more people, than it does here.
the links untimately link to an article on the BBC website, so how are they doctored? They were discussing heated gloves yesterday on the brexit thread, where were your objections to that? Pretty much any subject under the sun ends up on the brexit thread. Increasingly it's covid, far more than here.How is the cabinet office fine subject that you used as a false link anything to do with the Covid post you linked it to? Clearly it's you changing the subject within one post.
Stop doctoring links, Troll.
.
The link quoting the cabinet office fine would normally lead to that expicit post. You altered it to lead to your covid post. You've done similar a number of times, even across two different threads.the links untimately link to an article on the BBC website, so how are they doctored?
This website's scraping subroutine scrapes content from links - if the link is inter-forum, it scrapes off the first page - so in this case it scraped words such as "Cabinet" and "Office". That's not my doing. I linked, the forum's systems added the rest. That's how it works.How is the cabinet office fine subject that you used as a false link anything to do with the Covid post you linked it to? Clearly it's you changing the subject within one post.
Stop doctoring links, Troll.
.
I think you're misunderstanding how the words cabinet and office ended up being quoted on a link I posted - that was automatically done by this website.The link quoting the cabinet office fine would normally lead to that expicit post. You altered it to lead to your covid post. You've done similar a number of times, even across two different threads.
If you want to post on covid, just do so as an original post. Don't deliberately include a quote of mine from a different post on a different subject, deliberately to annoy.
.
Here's a random link:I fully understand what you are deliberately doing to annoy.
Why not quote accurately using the Reply button provided for that purpose? It's what our circa 15,000 other members do.
.
Keep in mind the death toll for those unvaccinated is in the region of 150,000.Covid patients in ICU now almost all unvaccinated, says Oxford scientist
Prof Sir Andrew Pollard says most of those infected who are fully vaccinated will experience only mild symptomswww.theguardian.com
I've met half-halfwits, who refused the second jab.Keep in mind the death toll for those unvaccinated is in the region of 150,000.
Obviously thee majority of those are from when there was no vaccine, and a small number have had rare complications from the vaccine itself, but the ratio of death in vaccinated-vaccinated is so high only a halfwit would consider the ratio to be worth refusal to take it.
Does this then make the case for mandatory vaccination ?.I've met half-halfwits, who refused the second jab.